Talk:Chain rule: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Paul Wormer (New page: {{subpages}} In line with the following, : <math>(f \circ g)' = (f' \circ g) . g' \,</math>, I would write for pedagogical reasons: :<math> z(y(x)) \leftrightarrow z\circ y(x), </math>...) |
imported>Richard Pinch (I stated the simplistic version precisely to explicate it better) |
||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
What do you think? --[[User:Paul Wormer|Paul Wormer]] 09:50, 8 November 2008 (UTC) | What do you think? --[[User:Paul Wormer|Paul Wormer]] 09:50, 8 November 2008 (UTC) | ||
:I'ld be happy for you to add that, but I want to state the simple dz/dy.dy/dx not because I approve of it, but precisely because I don't: that is, I want to explain it. [[User:Richard Pinch|Richard Pinch]] 11:48, 8 November 2008 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 05:48, 8 November 2008
In line with the following,
- ,
I would write for pedagogical reasons:
and that
reads in Leibniz (traditional) notation,
- .
What do you think? --Paul Wormer 09:50, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
- I'ld be happy for you to add that, but I want to state the simple dz/dy.dy/dx not because I approve of it, but precisely because I don't: that is, I want to explain it. Richard Pinch 11:48, 8 November 2008 (UTC)