Talk:Factor analysis: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Aleksander Stos
m (format, signature)
imported>Olav Næss
No edit summary
Line 14: Line 14:
==Remark==
==Remark==
I am not sure that splitting the article into sections "Psychometrics" and "Marketing" is helpful.  Factor Analysis is used in many other social and physical sciences.[[User:John Williams|John Williams]]
I am not sure that splitting the article into sections "Psychometrics" and "Marketing" is helpful.  Factor Analysis is used in many other social and physical sciences.[[User:John Williams|John Williams]]
I think '''Mathematical model''' ended rather abruply, but I suppose it is because the article is "under construction", and will continue with a discussion of rotation: orthogonal, some oblique models, as well as dismissing less significant factors as scree.  [[User:Olav Næss|Olav Næss]] 06:29, 7 April 2007 (CDT)

Revision as of 05:29, 7 April 2007


Article Checklist for "Factor analysis"
Workgroup category or categories Economics Workgroup, Psychology Workgroup, Mathematics Workgroup [Editors asked to check categories]
Article status External article: from another source, with little change
Underlinked article? Yes
Basic cleanup done? Yes
Checklist last edited by --AlekStos 04:13, 10 March 2007 (CST)

To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.






Remark

I am not sure that splitting the article into sections "Psychometrics" and "Marketing" is helpful. Factor Analysis is used in many other social and physical sciences.John Williams

I think Mathematical model ended rather abruply, but I suppose it is because the article is "under construction", and will continue with a discussion of rotation: orthogonal, some oblique models, as well as dismissing less significant factors as scree. Olav Næss 06:29, 7 April 2007 (CDT)