Talk:Scientology

I'm without doubt that this article will seem very incomplete. I would ask that people discuss before removing (what I think is) well referenced information. I went through a fair amount of work to present the information as cleanly as possible and attribute to sources of information present on the internet. I had to quote two lectures that are not present on the internet, as far as I know. They can be purchased by anyone by going to bridge pubs, and probably via email, asking them for the lecture by its attributed title and date. Terry E. Olsen 18:45, 23 April 2007 (CDT)

If you could consider re-wording your article to include less subjunctive and passive tense, and make it more, well, active tense and statement-like. As a non-Scientologist, I cannot understand this very well. Thanks.--Peter A. Lipson 15:08, 30 April 2007 (CDT)

Thank you Mr Lipson, will do. Also, I've moved it to Scientology (the philosophy) and will create Scientology (the religion) and then a disambiguation page. So the three should list out for any "go" or "search" as:

• Scientology (disambiguation)
• Scientology (the philosophy)
• Scientology (the religion) Terry E. Olsen 09:04, 1 May 2007 (CDT)

This will then allow a "go" or "search" for Scientology or scientology to find this article, I'll cause this article to recirect to the "Scientology (disambiguation)", there might be interest in creating such additional articles as "Scientology (spinoffs)" or other articles. Perhaps "Scientology (Dianetics)", I'm not at all sure how it will develop. Terry E. Olsen 09:34, 1 May 2007 (CDT)