User talk:D. Matt Innis
| Citizendium Moderator Group | ||
|---|---|---|
| Professionalism | Moderator Blocking Procedures | Article Deletion Policy Application Review Procedure | Moderator Policy | Help for Moderators |
|width=10% align=center style="background:#F5F5F5"| |}
| To Approve articles | Confirm Accounts | Diberri citation maker | Help Wikiformatting | Citizendium Test Wiki | CZ:How to use Bugzilla |
Where Matt lives it is approximately: 22:00
Leave questions and requests below
Question re 'disambiguation' pages
Through the 'Move' tab, I renamed Oxidation to Oxidation-Reduction, for reasons stated on the latter's Talk page. In addition, I created a REDIRECT page, redirecting Redox, an article we don't have, to Oxidation-Reduction, because oxidation-reduction reactions are commonly referred to as redox reactions.
We also have an article called Redox modulation. Will any problems arise if I create Redox/Disambiguation, and include both Redox and [Redox modulation]]? In other words, can a disambiguation page contain an article name that redirects to another article?
Thanks. Anthony.Sebastian 21:18, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
- Edit: I should have written Redox (disambiguation). Anthony.Sebastian 21:26, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
- No problems, but then Redox should redirect to the disambiguation page. And shouldn't the title rather be Oxidation-reduction (lowercase "r"). --Peter Schmitt 22:36, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
- Sounds right. So Redox should redirect to Redox(disambiguation) which would list Oxidation-reduction and Redox modulation as two links. D. Matt Innis 00:25, 28 March 2012 (UTC)
Please complete Approval Mechanics for Cypherpunk/Draft
Matt, I just now certified Cypherpunk/Draft for approval. Will you please complete Approval Mechanics to replace the currently locked version. Thank you. Anthony.Sebastian 20:36, 3 April 2012 (UTC), Approval Manager
- Matt, thank you for completing the process. I think Pat Palmer should have been the second approving editor, not Anthony.Sebastian. I missed that on the metadata page. Not sure we need to make any change, or that we even could if we wanted. Sorry, learning curves get steeper progressively after age 70. May have to up my fish oil supplement. Anthony.Sebastian 01:44, 4 April 2012 (UTC)
- Haha, you're not the only one, Anthony! I can't keep all these rules straight :) SO, does Pat have to put her name in the template herself (like editor's used to do before)? D. Matt Innis 02:25, 4 April 2012 (UTC)
History of economic thought certified for approval
Matt, will you please complete the Approval Mechanics for History of economic thought, which I certified for approval today. Thank you. Anthony.Sebastian 14:39, 18 April 2012 (UTC)
Alice and Bob certified for approval
Matt, will you complete the Approval Mechanics for Alice and Bob.
Thank you. Anthony.Sebastian 19:48, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
Economics
Matt, will you complete the Approval Mechanics for Economics, please. Anthony.Sebastian 19:52, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
- Matt, shouldn't the Economics Talk page be archived/moved and a fresh ones started for the new Draft? Anthony.Sebastian 15:37, 2 June 2012 (UTC)
- As part of Approval Mechanics, we've never archived a talk page immediately after an approval. Archiving has historically been left up to those working on the page. D. Matt Innis 23:48, 2 June 2012 (UTC)
Passive attack certified for approval
Matt, will you complete the approval process for this excellent article. I set status to "0". Thank you. Anthony.Sebastian 22:48, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
Active attack certified for approval
Matt, also this fine article. Status needs zeroing. Thanks. Anthony.Sebastian 23:03, 20 June 2012 (UTC)