Talk:Zimmerman Telegram

From Citizendium
Revision as of 08:45, 4 January 2009 by imported>Richard Pinch (puzzled as to why the wording should be described as an error)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This article is developing and not approved.
 Main Article
 Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
Signed Articles [?]
Addendum [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition:  A 1917 proposal from Germany to Mexico to make war against the United States. [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup categories:  History and Politics [Categories OK]
 Subgroup category:  International relations
 Talk Archive:  none  English language variant:  British English

Major Problem

This article has a couple of problems; one of which I fixed.

  1. "Germany had designs on taking over Mexico as its satellite." Which source made this claim or is this just a slur against Germany? (It may still be a slur against Germany even with a source.)
  2. "Mexico ... was to attack the United States on its Southwestern border and recover Texas, New Mexico, and Arizona." This is more problematic. Neither copy of the telegram here (at the US National Archives) or here (from the UK National Archives) indicates anything about what Mexico was to do. Indeed, strangely enough, the British document doesn't even mention what Mexico was to receive should Germany win the war with a Mexican alliance; only in the copy in the US archives (ostensibly the copy given to the US by British intelligence) mentions specifically US territories. Nice. So I removed this factual error from the article.
  3. Why do all the books in the bibliography (including Link) refer to the Zimmermann (two "n's") Telegram, yet this article is titled the Zimmerman (one "n") Telegram? Russell D. Jones 12:11, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
On (1), it seems a reasonable assessment that when a Great Power wants another country to accept funding to subordinate its war- and peace-making decisions to the aims of the Great Power, that it aims to turn that other country into a "satellite".
On (2), what is problematic? The wording you object to is in the copy you link to at the US National Archive, and in the transcript at the UK National Archive here and in the photocopy here. It can hardly be described as a "factual error". Why would you be unwilling to use it? Do you have a serious reason for believing that this is all incorrect? Why use the word "ostensibly" -- is there a serious reason to doubt the description? What do you mean by "Nice" in this context? Richard Pinch 14:45, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://citizendium.org/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:Zimmerman_Telegram&oldid=329770"