Talk:Global warming
Workgroup category or categories | Earth Sciences Workgroup [Categories OK] |
Article status | Developing article: beyond a stub, but incomplete |
Underlinked article? | Yes |
Basic cleanup done? | No |
Checklist last edited by | Nereo Preto 08:23, 26 May 2007 (CDT) |
To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.
This article talk page is now under dispute watch
See CZ:Dispute Watch. You're going to have to start using the {{prop}} template in the way that page describes, illustrated here: Talk:Oriental (word). We're testing out a dispute resolution idea, but I'm taking the test seriously. From now on, disputation on this page must be on-topic, and on-topic means (1) aimed at a specific proposition, (2) the proposition must concern the wording of the text, and (3) engaging in a dispute, as opposed to how to characterize the dispute, is off-topic. Call it the Anti-Bloviation Rule! :-)
Note, for this topic in particular, that how much dispute there is about this topic is itself (pretty obviously) a matter of dispute. So we must not take a stand on that dispute, but must describe it. --Larry Sanger 07:17, 3 August 2007 (CDT)
- So we must suggest a different and specific change in the article's text to dispute the content herein? Benjamin Seghers 09:20, 3 August 2007 (CDT)
Yep. But notice that the change can be: delete it. --Larry Sanger 09:22, 3 August 2007 (CDT)
- Earth Sciences Category Check
- General Category Check
- Category Check
- Advanced Articles
- Nonstub Articles
- Internal Articles
- Earth Sciences Advanced Articles
- Earth Sciences Nonstub Articles
- Earth Sciences Internal Articles
- Developed Articles
- Earth Sciences Developed Articles
- Developing Articles
- Earth Sciences Developing Articles
- Stub Articles
- Earth Sciences Stub Articles
- External Articles
- Earth Sciences External Articles
- Earth Sciences Underlinked Articles
- Underlinked Articles
- Earth Sciences Cleanup
- General Cleanup
- Cleanup
- Dispute Watch