Talk:Logical positivism

From Citizendium
Revision as of 10:35, 4 November 2007 by imported>Subpagination Bot (Add {{subpages}} and remove checklist (details))
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This article is developed but not approved.
 Main Article
 Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition:  A school of philosophy that combines positivism—which states that the only authentic knowledge is scientific knowledge—with some kind of logical analysis, which is similar, but not the same as logicism. [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup category:  Philosophy [Categories OK]
 Talk Archive:  none  English language variant:  British English

Ethics

"affirmed that statements about metaphysics, religion and ethics are devoid of cognitive meaning "

Moritz Schlick: "Problems of Ethics", 1939. I doubt that we can simplify the views of the Vienna Circle about ethics this way.

--Matthias Brendel 09:17, 20 November 2006 (CST)

Logical Empiricism

As I know, the philosophy of the Vienna Circle is called Logical Positivism, while the philosophy of the Berlin Circle (Reichenbach) as logical empirism. So they are not synonims, altough almost indistinguishable. --Matthias Brendel 09:20, 20 November 2006 (CST)

Uneven article

I think this is an article, which takes a very English view of logical positivism. There is too much focus on Unified Science, Ayer, Wittgenstein, and two few details on other things. --Matthias Brendel 09:35, 20 November 2006 (CST)

checked

and of course not deleted. DavidGoodman 20:48, 18 February 2007 (CST)

Retrieved from "https://citizendium.org/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:Logical_positivism&oldid=10056"