Life/Citable Version

For other uses, see Life (disambiguation), Lives (disambiguation) or Living (disambiguation)

Biologists use the term life to refer to the process(es) comprising the activity of living, and to the entities that embody that/those process(es). The question turns on what precisely characterizes the "process of living". In answering that question, biologists may find the answers to many other questions, perhaps even some not yet asked (see Biology and Systems biology). For example, do viruses count as living things? Can we create living things not based on carbon and water chemistry (see Artificial life)? Could livings exist that consisted of purely computational processes [bits] or purely immaterial processes?

In addition to sharing a common carbon and water-based chemistry, those entities generally acknowledged as living systems——namely organisms——share a common basic building block, the cell. Some organisms live freely as single cells, others as multicellular, with various cell types specialized for different functions. Nature has produced an enormous array of different cell types. Biologists view the commonalities and uniqueness of the different cell types from several perspectives:

• from the list of organic and inorganic parts (carbon-containing molecules and inorganic ions (Aristotle’s material explanation);
• from the way the parts organize themselves in relation to each other to form substructures (patterns of form) (Aristotle’s formal [form-like] explanation;
• from the way the components of the substructures interact with each in a coordinated dynamic manner and the way the substructures interact among themselves in a coordinated dynamic, and hierarchical manner (Aristotle’s efficient [effective] explanation; and,
• from the way the cell as-a-whole functions and behaves and the properties that characterize it (Aristotle’s final explanation).

Biologists also view the commonalities among living things from the perspective of thermodynamics—the physics of the relationships among energy (capacity to do work), heat (thermal energy), work (movement through force), and entropy (degree of disorder or of missing information), which determine what the thermodynamic system can and cannot do during the process of converting energy to work or other forms of energy.

Unlike classical thermodynamics, in which the initial and final states of the system studied remain in equilibrium (i.e., without tendency for a spontaneous change to occur, because opposing forces remain in balance), non-equilibrium thermodynamics can describe the behavior of systems that remain far-from-equilibrium but nevertheless tend to transfer energy from one place to another or convert energy from one form to another in processes the move the system towards an irreversible state of stability characterized by randomness or disorder.

Living systems qualify as far-from-equilibrium systems, moving toward the randomness of a non-living state. During their lefspans, living systems produce order and maintain a state of non-randomness for prolonged periods because they carry out processes that keep them in a condition far from the stability (equilibrium) of randomness. The achieve that by transforming energy, matter and negentropy (information), which they import from their extenal environment, into the work rquired to sustain their integrity. In addition, they produce entropy (disorder, lost information) and discard it into the external environment. The non-closed biological system maintains its internal state of ordered organization and process at the expense of the external environment to which it has access, leaving the environment more disordered and information-poor.

Thus, the following could serves as one valid fundamental characterization of 'life, or of living things:

• The ability to remain as an ordered, coordinated functioning system with spontaneous and externally forced tendencies to change balanced by built-in self-correcting mechanisms fueled by external resources and facilitated by importation of information and by exportation of disorder, all the while operating far-from-equilibrium.

Marcello Barbieri, Professor of Morphology and Embryology, University of Ferrara, Italy, in his Book ‘’The Organic Codes’’ collected a long list of definitions of “Life” from scientists and philosophers of the 19th and 20th centuries. Many resonate with the above exposition:

• The broadest and most complete definition of life will be "the continuous adjustment of internal to external relations". —Hebert Spencer (1884)

• It is the particular manner of composition of the materials and processes, their spatial and temporal organisation which constitute what we call life. — A. Putter (1923)

• A living organism is a system organised in a hierarchic order of many different parts, in which a great number of processes are so disposed that by means of their mutual relations, within wide limits with constant change of the materials and energies constituting the system, and also in spite of disturbances conditioned by external influences, the system ts generated or remains in the state characteristic of it, or these processes lead to the production of similar systems. — Ludwig von Bertalanffy (1933)

• Life seems to be an orderly and lawful behaviour of matter, not based exclusively on its tendency to go from order to disorder, but based partly on existing order that is kept up. —Erwin Schrodinger (1944)

• Life is made of three basic elements: matter, energy and information. ..Any element in life that is not matter and energy can be reduced to information. — P.Fong (1973)

• A living system is an open system that is self-replicating, self-regulating, and feeds on energy from the environment. —R. Sattler (1986)

• A physical system can be said to be living if it is able to transform external energy/matter into an internal process of self-maintenance and self-generation. This common sense, macroscopic definition, finds its equivalent at the cellular level in the notion of autopoiesis. This can be generalised to describe the general pattern for minimal life, including artificial life. In real life, the autopoietic network of reactions is under the control of nucleic adds and the corresponding proteins. —Francisco Varela (1996)

The persistence of a living system's status as a far-from-equilibrium systems requires a set of system mechanisms that enable it to import matter, energy and information from the environment and convert those to the work of self-maintenance. Those mechanisms--transcription and translation, cell-signalling, metabolism, transmembrane transport, and many others---generically common but differing in details among cell types----allow further consideration of the commonalities and differences among living things.

[...more...]

Properties common to terrestrial organisms (plants, animals, fungi, protists and bacteria) are that they are cellular, carbon-and-water-based with complex organization, having a metabolism, a capacity to grow, respond to stimuli, reproduce, change their inheritable characteristics, and—through natural selection— adapt.

An entity with the above properties is considered to be organic life. However, not every definition of life considers all of these properties to be essential. For example, the capacity for descent with inheritable modification is often taken as the only essential property of life. This definition notably includes viruses, which do not qualify under narrower definitions as they are acellular and do not metabolise. Broader definitions of life may also include theoretical non-carbon-based life and other alternative biology.

The entire Earth contains about 75 billion tons of living matter (needs source-citation) (biomass), living in nearly every conceivable niche of the earth---the interior of "solid" rocks, ocean-bottom volcanic vents at boiling-water temperatures---all comprising a so-called biosphere.

Definition

Life itself is a set of processes that are carried out by an organism enabling it to survive or leave progeny.

In religious metaphysics an organism possesses life during the period between an organism's acquisition of a spirit, upon Fertilisation, until its spirit's terminal evacuation, upon death.

A conventional definition

Although there is no universal agreement on the definition of life, scientists generally accept that the biological manifestation of life exhibits the following phenomena:

1. Organization: Being composed of one or more cells, which are the basic units of life.
2. Metabolism: Production of energy by converting nonliving material into cellular components (synthesis) and decomposing organic matter (catalysis). Living things require energy to maintain internal organization (homeostasis) and to produce the other phenomena associated with life.
3. Growth: Maintenance of a higher rate of synthesis than catalysis. A growing organism increases in size in all of its parts, rather than simply accumulating matter. The particular species begins to multiply and expand as the evolution continues to flourish.
4. Reproduction: The ability to produce new organisms. Reproduction can be the division of one cell to form two new cells. Usually the term is applied to the production of a new individual (either asexually, from a single parent organism, or sexually, from at least two differing parent organisms), although strictly speaking it also describes the production of new cells in the process of growth.
5. Gain new inheritable traits.: Inheritable diversity among progeny organisms, whether adaptive, neutral or disadvantageous, is a common feature of living things, and the starting point for natural selection.
6. Adaptation: The ability to gain abilities that improve organism survival ability is fundamental to the process of evolution and is determined by the organism's heredity as well as the composition of metabolized substances, and external factors present.
7. Response to stimuli: A response can take many forms, from the contraction of a unicellular organism when touched to complex reactions involving all the senses of higher animals. A response is often expressed by motion, for example, the leaves of a plant turning toward the sun or an animal chasing its prey.
8. Homeostasis: Regulation of the internal environment to maintain a constant state; for example, sweating to cool off.

Exceptions to the conventional definition

It is important to note that life is a definition that applies primarily at the level of species, so even though many individuals of any given species do not reproduce, possibly because they belong to specialized sterile castes (such as ant workers), these are still considered forms of life. One could say that the property of life is inherited; hence, sterile hybrid species such as the mule are considered life although not themselves capable of reproduction. It is also worth noting that non-reproducing individuals may still help the spread of their genes through such mechanisms as kin selection.

For similar reasons, viruses and aberrant prion proteins are often considered replicators rather than forms of life, a distinction warranted because they cannot reproduce without very specialized substrates such as host cells or proteins, respectively. However, most forms of life rely on foods produced by other species, or at least the specific chemistry of Earth's environment.

Some individuals contest such definitions of life on philosophical grounds, and offer the following as examples of life: viruses which reproduce; flames which "grow"; certain computer software programs which are programmed to mutate and evolve; future software programs which may evince (even high-order) behavior; machines which can move; and some forms of proto-life consisting of metabolizing cells without the ability to reproduce. Template:Citation needed

Still, most scientists would not call such phenomena expressive of life. Generally all six characteristics are required for a population to be considered a life form.

Descent with modification

A useful characteristic upon which to base a definition of life is that of descent with modification: the ability of a life form to produce offspring that are like its parent or parents, but with the possibility of some variation due to chance. Descent with modification is sufficient by itself to allow evolution, assuming that the variations in the offspring allow for differential survival. The study of this form of heritability is called genetics. In all known life forms (assuming prions are not counted as such), the genetic material is primarily DNA or the related molecule, RNA.

Unlike other definitions, this definition of life includes viruses, as they are replicators with a genotype and phenotype, making them capable of natural selection and evolution. The definition may also include other replicating elements, including plasmids, which are otherwise considered part of a larger organism.

Also difficult for this definition is organisms which cannot reproduce directly, such as worker bees—which may also continue their gene-line by helping to produce siblings, and sterilised organisms, such as spayed or neutered pets, which are no longer capable of descent.

More abstract concepts may also be considered alive by this definition, including memes and the artificial life of computer software, such as self-modifying computer viruses and programs created through genetic programming.

The chemoton model

The chemoton is an abstract model for life introduced by Tibor Gánti in 1971. Its aim was to define the minimal model of a living organism.

A living system:

1. Has to be separated from its environment.
2. Has to perform metabolism with its environment.
3. It must replicate itself.
4. It has to have a polimer type subsystem carrying information.
5. It must have an autocatalytic system, which is connected to the metabolism and creates the stuff needed to grow its boundary and to replicate its information system.

Such a system may be called alive, since it can live, replicate in its proper environment and it can evolve, since there is an information system.

Other definitions

The systemic definition is that living things are self-organizing and autopoietic (self-producing). These objects are not to be confused with dissipative structures (e.g. fire).

Variations of this definition include Stuart Kauffman's definition of life as an autonomous agent or a multi-agent system capable of reproducing itself or themselves, and of completing at least one thermodynamic work cycle.

Another definition is : "Living things are systems that tend to respond to changes in their environment, and inside themselves, in such a way as to promote their own continuation."

Yet another definition: "Life is a self-organizing, cannibalistic system consisting of a population of replicators that are capable of mutation, around most of which homeostatic, metabolizing organisms evolve." This definition does not include flames, but does include worker ants, viruses and mules. Without 'most of', it does not include viruses.

Self reproduction and energy consumption is only one means for a system to promote its own continuation. This explains why bees can be alive and yet commit suicide in defending their hive. In this case the whole colony works as such a living system.

Linguistic Considerations Relating to the Definition of Life

Ernst Mayr, a 20th century giant among evolutionary biologists, in his last decade as a centenarian, wrote a book called This is Biology: The Science of the Living World (Mayr 1997). In his opening chapter, What Is the Meaning of “Life” [his quotation marks], he states:

"To elucidate the nature of this entity called "life" has been one of the major objectives of biology. The problem here is that "life" suggests some "thing" -- a substance or force -- and for centuries philosophers and biologists have tried to identify this life substance or vital force, to no avail. In reality, the noun "life" is merely a reification of the process of living. It does not exist as an independent entity. One can deal with the process of living scientifically, something one cannot do with the abstraction "life". One can describe, even attempt to define, what living is; one can define what a living organism is; and one can attempt to make a demarcation between living and nonliving. Indeed, one can even attempt to explain how living, as a process can be the product of molecules that themselves are not living." (Mayr 1997, page 2).

Professor Mayr’s thoughts suggest we should fuss less about defining the nominalization, “life”, and concentrate more on defining the process, “living”.

Ultimately, all definitions of words in terms of other words converge on a set of some 70 so-called semantic primes, viz., primitive words, each undefinable in terms of other words, universal among languages, whose meaning one learns heuristically from their usage in the socio-cultural matrix in which one lives. One can define any non-semantic-prime word with some combination of semantic primes. The linguists who pioneered the theory of semantic primes do not list “life” as a primitive word, though they do list the verb “live” as such. See list of semantic primes at this site:

“Life” defines as “this lives” or “something lives”, where “lives” both speakers and listeners understand primitively, through experience. They also know primitively that things which live “die” and they generate the word “death” to refer to “dying”. “Plants” define as “things that live”, machines as “things that do not live” or “things that people make”.

To explain life, then, one must first explain living.

Interestingly, in English, according to the earliest references the Oxford English Dictionary finds, the verb “to live” preceded usage of the noun “life” by some 300 years.

The question, then, not “what is life?”, but “what characterizes things that live?” In fact, biologists act on the latter question, even as they ask it in terms of the former.

Quoting biologist, logician and historian J.H. Woodger (1929):

• ”It does not seem necessary to stop at the word "life" because this term can be eliminated from the scientific vocabulary since it is an indefinable abstraction and we can get along perfectly well with "living organism" which is an entity which can be speculatively demonstrated.” — J.H.Woodger (1929)

One way to compose an encyclopedia entry on “Life”: define it as a nominalization of the process of living, and redirect to the entry “Living”.

Origin of life

There is no truly "standard" model for the origin of life, but most currently accepted scientific models build in one way or another on the following discoveries, which are listed roughly in order of postulated emergence:

1. Plausible pre-biotic conditions result in the creation of the basic small molecules of life. This was demonstrated in the Miller-Urey experiment.
2. Phospholipids spontaneously form lipid bilayers, the basic structure of a cell membrane.
3. Procedures for producing random RNA molecules can produce ribozymes, which are able to produce more of themselves under very specific conditions.

There are many different hypotheses regarding the path that might have been taken from simple organic molecules to protocells and metabolism. Many models fall into the "genes-first" category or the "metabolism-first" category, but a recent trend is the emergence of hybrid models that do not fit into either of these categories.

The possibility of extraterrestrial life

Main articles: Extraterrestrial life, Astrobiology

Earth is the only planet in the universe known to harbor life. The Drake equation has been used to estimate the probability of life elsewhere, but scientists disagree on many of the values of variables in this equation. Depending on those values, the equation may either suggest that life arises frequently or infrequently.

See also

• Artificial life
• Extraterrestrial life
• Biological kingdom
• Origin of life

References

Further reading

• Kauffman, Stuart. The Adjacent Possible: A Talk with Stuart Kauffman. Retrieved Nov. 30, 2003 from [1]
• Lynn Margulis and Dorion Sagan - What is Life? (1995). Simon & Schuster. ISBN 0-684-81087-5
• Erwin Schrodinger - What is Life? (1944 to 2000). Cambridge University Press (Canto). ISBN 0-521-42708-8

See also

• Origin of life
• Evolution of cells

External links

• "In the Beginning..." (The Economist)
• "The Adjacent Possible: A Talk with Stuart Kauffman"
• Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy entry
• The Biologist
• Understanding Life
• Life under extreme conditions An in depth look at how life can form under the most extreme conditions.
• The universal nature of biochemistry