Knowledge

From Citizendium
Revision as of 14:23, 2 July 2008 by imported>Larry Sanger
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This article is a stub and thus not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
This editable Main Article is under development and subject to a disclaimer.

Knowledge, on one common account by philosophers, is justified, true belief. But this is only one philosophical account, and knowledge is often used in a looser way by everyone else to mean any truth or belief, and also a whole body of truth or a whole system of belief. For "knowledge" in this latter sense, see world view, ideology, and religion.

Knowledge in the stricter, philosophical sense is the central topic of the philosophical subdiscipline of epistemology. A good place to begin with this topic is by explaining why most philosophers do distinguish between knowledge on the one hand, and both truth and belief on the other hand.

First, knowledge is said to differ from truth for the simple reason that not all truths are known; in other words, there are undiscovered truths. Some people (including some philosophers) are apt to respond to this by asking, "What sort of thing is an undiscovered truth?" This is an ontological issue, however, and most of us will probably be satisfied if we simply give examples. For instance, the second law of thermodynamics was true prior to its being formulated in the 19th century.

Second, knowledge is said to differ from belief because we believe many things when we do not really know them.[1]

Notes

  1. Some philosophers are even capable of saying that we can have knowledge of a fact without believing it. Cf. Colin Radford, "Knowledge--By Examples." (complete reference needed).