CZ:Literature Workgroup

Workgroups are no longer used for group communications, but they still are used to group articles into fields of interest. Each article is assigned to 1-3 Workgroups via the article's Metadata.

Literature Workgroup
Literature article	All articles (845)	To Approve (0)	Editors: active (2) / inactive (15) and Authors: active (267) / inactive (0)	Workgroup Discussion
	Recent changes	Citable Articles (2)
		Subgroups (4)

Checklist-generated categories: Underlinked (446) Cat Check (437) Cleanup (0) Subpage categories: Definitions (751) Related Articles (516 to check 183) Bibliography (217) External Links (236) Gallery (0) Video (1)

Missing subpage categories: Definitions (54) Related Articles (34) Bibliography (47) External Links (46) Article statuses: 97 Developed (status=1) 333 Developing (status=2) 404 Stub (status=3) 4 External (status=4) 99 Advanced (status 0-1) 432 Nonstub (status 0-2) 836 Internal (status 0-3)

The purpose of this Literature Workgroup is to co-ordinate and organise the work on, and improvement of, articles on Literature. If you'd like to join as an Author, please add yourself to Category:Literature Authors, introduce yourself on the Literature Workgroup Forum and start improving articles. If you think you have the expertise to be an Editor, take a look at the instructions on how to become an editor and then add yourself to Category: Literature Editors.

List of Articles

Ancient Literature

Ancient Greek literature | Roman literature

Homer | Gilgamesh | Herodotus | Aeschylus | Sophocles | Euripides | Plato | Menander | Callimachus | Theocritus | Lucretius | Cicero | Virgil | Propertius | Ovid | Tibullus | Lucan | Lucian | Apuleius

Medieval Literature

Anglo-saxon literature | Middle English literature | Goliardic poetry | fabliaux

Beowulf | Macrobius | Boethius | Geoffrey Chaucer | The Canterbury Tales | Piers Plowman

English-language Literature

William Shakespeare | Ben Jonson | John Webster | Andrew Marvell | John Donne | Richard Crashaw | Henry Vaughan | Thomas Traherne | George Herbert | metaphysical poets | John Dryden | Alexander Pope | Samuel Johnson | Samuel Richardson | Jane Austen | Charles Dickens | Emily Brontë | Charlotte Brontë | Anne Brontë | William Makepeace Thackeray | Thomas Hardy | G.K. Chesterton

Anne Bradstreet | William Cullen Bryant | Walt Whitman | Henry David Thoreau | Nathaniel Hawthorne | Herman Melville | William Faulkner | F. Scott Fitzgerald | Ernest Hemingway

French Literature

François Villon | Voltaire | Pierre Corneille | Molière | Jean Racine

German-language literature

Johann Wolfgang von Goethe | Friedrich Schiller | Hölderlin | Novalis | Heinrich Heine | Arthur Schnitzler | Thomas Mann | Gottfried Benn | Heinrich Böll | Günter Grass

News (updated 4/11/07)

CONGRATULATIONS! to the Literature Workgroup -- our toplevel entry for Literature is now approved!! Russell Potter 16:34, 11 May 2007 (CDT)

To get this group underway, I've created this page. Please feel free to edit and get involved. We do need to decide on subgroups and update and expand topics. Amal Chatterjee 03:52, 21 November 2006 (CST)

Suggestions for subgroups

These are just thoughts, can we get a discussion going? One way to go would be to organise literature on language

• Literature in English
• Literature in Spanish
• Literature in Indian Languages
• Literature in Arabic
• Literature in Russian
• Literature in Chinese
• Literature in East Asian Languages
• and so on

Or to use region-based categories common in university departments, eg:

• English Literature
• American Literature
• Spanish Literature
• Indian Literature
• Arabic Literature
• South Asian Literature
• East Asian Literature
• Chinese Literature
• Sudanese Literature
• and so on

We could also begin with categories like Prose, Poetry etc ...

Amal Chatterjee 03:46, 21 November 2006 (CST)

Categories and subgroups

While these high-level categories may have their uses in terms of lateral organization -- each, presumably, would involve a sub-group of editors and authors fluent in the requisite language(s) -- for the time being I think we would do better to see what areas of interest current editors and authors have, and set about working on articles. Ad-hoc working subgroups could then be created as needed if, for instance, a group of people working on Victoria literature, or the Epic, or the poetry of Languedoc, or graphic novels, or whatever. In other words, I think for now we should write 'from the bottom up' as it were. There may also be a need to edit from the top down at some point, but this will be far easier once we've all done some work on specific articles together.

Let's continue to discuss this in the forum!

Russell Potter 10:33, 21 November 2006 (CST)