Talk:History of Quakers in Britain and Ireland: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Peter Jackson
No edit summary
imported>Martin Wyatt
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:


"The Reform Act of 1832 enabled Quakers to stand for Parliament." I don't think that's right. I can't see anything in [https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=Uq0uAAAAIAAJ&pg=PA154&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false the Act] about this. I don't think there was ever a law against Quakers in Parliament, but strict ones wouldn't take the oath required for taking seats. Affirmation was admitted as an alternative by the Oaths Act 1888, though that was a response to the case of Charles Bradlaugh, not Quakers. [[User:Peter Jackson|Peter Jackson]] ([[User talk:Peter Jackson|talk]]) 09:01, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
"The Reform Act of 1832 enabled Quakers to stand for Parliament." I don't think that's right. I can't see anything in [https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=Uq0uAAAAIAAJ&pg=PA154&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false the Act] about this. I don't think there was ever a law against Quakers in Parliament, but strict ones wouldn't take the oath required for taking seats. Affirmation was admitted as an alternative by the Oaths Act 1888, though that was a response to the case of Charles Bradlaugh, not Quakers. [[User:Peter Jackson|Peter Jackson]] ([[User talk:Peter Jackson|talk]]) 09:01, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
:My wording is probably incorrect.  The information I have, admittedly from an author whom I have detected in more than one historical mistake, is that affirmation enabled Quakers to enter the House of Commons in 1832.  Bradlaugh's case, as an atheist, was slightly different.  I will see what more I can find.  --[[User:Martin Wyatt|Martin Wyatt]] ([[User talk:Martin Wyatt|talk]]) 13:09, 27 August 2016 (UTC)

Revision as of 07:09, 27 August 2016

This article is developed but not approved.
 Main Article
 Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition:  Quaker history in the British isles after the birth of the movement. [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup categories:  History and Religion [Editors asked to check categories]
 Talk Archive:  none  English language variant:  British English

This article has ground to a halt while I try to gather information on Scotland and Ireland, for which I am lacking materials. Any help gratefully received. --Martin Wyatt 19:39, 10 August 2013 (UTC)

"The Reform Act of 1832 enabled Quakers to stand for Parliament." I don't think that's right. I can't see anything in the Act about this. I don't think there was ever a law against Quakers in Parliament, but strict ones wouldn't take the oath required for taking seats. Affirmation was admitted as an alternative by the Oaths Act 1888, though that was a response to the case of Charles Bradlaugh, not Quakers. Peter Jackson (talk) 09:01, 26 August 2016 (UTC)

My wording is probably incorrect. The information I have, admittedly from an author whom I have detected in more than one historical mistake, is that affirmation enabled Quakers to enter the House of Commons in 1832. Bradlaugh's case, as an atheist, was slightly different. I will see what more I can find. --Martin Wyatt (talk) 13:09, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://citizendium.org/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:History_of_Quakers_in_Britain_and_Ireland&oldid=845805"