User talk:Peter Schmitt: Difference between revisions
imported>Peter Schmitt |
imported>Anthony.Sebastian |
||
Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
: It is the latest [http://en.citizendium.org/wiki?title=Cypherpunk/Draft&oldid=100798547 version]. You yourself put it into the Metadata but forgot to change the date of the version. (The Approval Manager chooses the version to approve.) --[[User:Peter Schmitt|Peter Schmitt]] 22:52, 31 March 2012 (UTC) | : It is the latest [http://en.citizendium.org/wiki?title=Cypherpunk/Draft&oldid=100798547 version]. You yourself put it into the Metadata but forgot to change the date of the version. (The Approval Manager chooses the version to approve.) --[[User:Peter Schmitt|Peter Schmitt]] 22:52, 31 March 2012 (UTC) | ||
:: Peter, when I view the latest version of [[Cypherpunk/Draft]] and ask for a permanent link, I get: | |||
::: http://en.citizendium.org/wiki?title=Cypherpunk/Draft&oldid=100798547 | |||
::: Revision as of 23:50, 21 March 2012 by Sandy Harris (Talk | contribs) | |||
When I view the revision history of the latest version, I get: | |||
::: (cur | prev) 23:50, 21 March 2012 Sandy Harris (Talk | contribs) (35,815 bytes) (→Expert panels) (undo) | |||
On the metadata page, in the “Required for the ToApprove template” section, I see: | |||
::: article url = http://en.citizendium.org/wiki?title=Cypherpunk/Draft&oldid=100798547 | |||
::: now = 07:50, 22 March 2012 | |||
However, I interpret “now= “ as requiring 23:50, 21 March 2012 | |||
So. I still can’t justify “now= 07:50, 22 March 2012” as applicable. | |||
What am I missing? [[User:Anthony.Sebastian|Anthony.Sebastian]] 14:29, 1 April 2012 (UTC) |
Revision as of 08:29, 1 April 2012
The account of this former contributor was not re-activated after the server upgrade of March 2022.
Where Peter lives it is approximately: 01:42
< | 2009(May19-Dec31) / 2010(Jan01-Aug28) / Sep 2010--2011 |
---|
Waiting for a reply!
Peter, we are waiting for a reply at, http://forum.citizendium.org/index.php/topic,4237.0.html Please do the needful.-Ramanand Jhingade 17:10, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
- This has to be decided by the EC (see EC:2012-005). --Peter Schmitt 01:30, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
Randomized controlled trial
How do we finish the approval of Randomized controlled trial? Also, how do we make the approval process more intuitive? Thanks - Robert Badgett 04:44, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
- Robert, we have an "approvals manager" whose task it is to finish the approval. You can ask him about it here. David Finn 07:47, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
- The EC is aware of this issue and will deal with it. --Peter Schmitt 23:56, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
Still having trouble nominating Boiling point/Draft
Somthing different about the metadata page. Will you look at it, and please advise. Thanks. —14:47, 2 March 2012 (UTC)
Re-approval of Boiling point/Draft is still in limbo
Peter, please read Matt's talk page to see why the re-approval of Boiling point/Draft has still not yet been implemented. I think your direction (or at least a comment) is needed to get this done. Milton Beychok 21:21, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
Travelling
I am travelling right now (for 1-2 weeks) and do not know when (or whether) I'll be online during this period. --Peter Schmitt 11:12, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
Re failed Approval
Peter, thanks for showing me how to fix the Approval template for a dropped case. Anthony.Sebastian 01:58, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
Revision date update for Cypherpunk/Draft
Peter, you recently updated the version to the version dated 07:50, 22 March 2012, but I do not find such version. What am I missing? Anthony.Sebastian 20:31, 31 March 2012 (UTC)
- It is the latest version. You yourself put it into the Metadata but forgot to change the date of the version. (The Approval Manager chooses the version to approve.) --Peter Schmitt 22:52, 31 March 2012 (UTC)
- Peter, when I view the latest version of Cypherpunk/Draft and ask for a permanent link, I get:
- Revision as of 23:50, 21 March 2012 by Sandy Harris (Talk | contribs)
When I view the revision history of the latest version, I get:
- (cur | prev) 23:50, 21 March 2012 Sandy Harris (Talk | contribs) (35,815 bytes) (→Expert panels) (undo)
On the metadata page, in the “Required for the ToApprove template” section, I see:
- now = 07:50, 22 March 2012
However, I interpret “now= “ as requiring 23:50, 21 March 2012
So. I still can’t justify “now= 07:50, 22 March 2012” as applicable.
What am I missing? Anthony.Sebastian 14:29, 1 April 2012 (UTC)