Talk:Aminostatic hypothesis: Difference between revisions
imported>Sandy Harris m (question about signatures) |
imported>Gareth Leng |
||
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
This article has many sigs. I removed some, almost as a reflex action, but stopped when I realised you seem to be using them to keep comments straight during article development. Certainly they should all go eventually, but I'm not certain if they should be removed immediately or left as long as you need them. [[User:Sandy Harris|Sandy Harris]] 06:45, 26 October 2011 (UTC) | This article has many sigs. I removed some, almost as a reflex action, but stopped when I realised you seem to be using them to keep comments straight during article development. Certainly they should all go eventually, but I'm not certain if they should be removed immediately or left as long as you need them. [[User:Sandy Harris|Sandy Harris]] 06:45, 26 October 2011 (UTC) | ||
Thanks Sandy; I'll clean up in due course, but for now don't want to get in the way of enthusiasm.[[User:Gareth Leng|Gareth Leng]] 10:04, 26 October 2011 (UTC) |
Revision as of 04:04, 26 October 2011
Gianna Maurer 10:12, 24 September 2011 (UTC) Ashleigh Fraser 12:25, 25 September 2011 (UTC) Gianna Maurer 14:38, 11 October 2011 (UTC) Gianna Maurer 14:07, 16 October 2011 (UTC)
Hi Gianna, good work with the references, it would have been even better with a small summary for each article.
Lisa, I moved the references you added into the Bibliography page.
Nancy Sabatier 15:13, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
Yes, good selection - but now you need to add a summary of the key points from each - that will make writing the article much simpler.Gareth Leng 19:57, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
Signatures
Normal practice on this and other wikis is to sign talk page comments with ~~~~ but not to sign article contributions. It is possible to tell who contributed what by looking at the article history, and sigs tend to clutter the article.
This article has many sigs. I removed some, almost as a reflex action, but stopped when I realised you seem to be using them to keep comments straight during article development. Certainly they should all go eventually, but I'm not certain if they should be removed immediately or left as long as you need them. Sandy Harris 06:45, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
Thanks Sandy; I'll clean up in due course, but for now don't want to get in the way of enthusiasm.Gareth Leng 10:04, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
- Article with Definition
- Biology Category Check
- Health Sciences Category Check
- Eduzendium Category Check
- Developing Articles
- Nonstub Articles
- Internal Articles
- Biology Developing Articles
- Biology Nonstub Articles
- Biology Internal Articles
- Health Sciences Developing Articles
- Health Sciences Nonstub Articles
- Health Sciences Internal Articles
- Eduzendium Developing Articles
- Eduzendium Nonstub Articles
- Eduzendium Internal Articles
- Biology Underlinked Articles
- Underlinked Articles
- Health Sciences Underlinked Articles
- Eduzendium Underlinked Articles