Talk:Homeopathy/Archive 16: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Peter Schmitt
(NOTICE)
imported>Ramanand Jhingade
No edit summary
Line 5: Line 5:


<hr><br>
<hr><br>
NNNNN
I protest the fact that this article has not been approved by any homeopath. What is the idea in not allowing an expert in the field approve an article (since that was what Citizendium was created for in the first place)?—[[User:Ramanand Jhingade|Ramanand Jhingade]] 13:29, 17 December 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 07:29, 17 December 2010

This article is developed but not approved.
 Main Article
 Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
Catalogs [?]
Video [?]
Signed Articles [?]
 
The Editorial Council has made a unanimous decision on December 17, 2010, to blank this draft article and to place a minimum of a one-year moratorium on any further edits to this article. The discussion concerning this decision may be found at [1]. The Talk page remains, but its present contents will be moved to an archive. The Approved Main Article also remains in place. This page is now protected by the Constabulary and no further edits can be made to it. After one year has passed, Citizens may ask the Editorial Council to reconsider their decision but there is no guarantee that they will do so.


The Secretary of the Editorial Council, Hayford Peirce 04:09, 17 December 2010 (UTC)


I protest the fact that this article has not been approved by any homeopath. What is the idea in not allowing an expert in the field approve an article (since that was what Citizendium was created for in the first place)?—Ramanand Jhingade 13:29, 17 December 2010 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://citizendium.org/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:Homeopathy/Archive_16&oldid=816786"