CZ Talk:Editorial Council: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>David Finn (lock the page now, anything beyone the members names can be agreed to via draft) |
imported>Peter Schmitt (locking is not needed) |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
:::Fair enough. I guess I am used to regular citizendium pages where changes you don't like can quickly be undone. Probably best to ask that this page be locked right away and a draft page started, that way no danger of non-EC members editing it by mistake. [[User:David Finn|David Finn]] 07:28, 30 October 2010 (UTC) | :::Fair enough. I guess I am used to regular citizendium pages where changes you don't like can quickly be undone. Probably best to ask that this page be locked right away and a draft page started, that way no danger of non-EC members editing it by mistake. [[User:David Finn|David Finn]] 07:28, 30 October 2010 (UTC) | ||
:::: I do not think that locking the page is needed. Unwanted edits can easily be reverted. --[[User:Peter Schmitt|Peter Schmitt]] 10:13, 30 October 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 04:13, 30 October 2010
Created CZ: Editorial Council with election information, and moved the previous contents to CZ: Editorial Council/Pre-2010 Election Howard C. Berkowitz 02:00, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
This page change was not authorised by the Editorial Council and is therefore not the official page. Since there are no actual errors of fact, I will leave it in this state for the time being, until the EC decides what should appear here. Martin Baldwin-Edwards 04:21, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
- If the Editorial Council will have to convene to authorize every page change it will be quite a while before they get to any actual Citizendium business, don't you think? David Finn 06:40, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
- It's the format that is the issue; normally the Secretary is responsible for making official changes, anyway. I am leaving it as it is, since it's preferable to outdated info. Martin Baldwin-Edwards 07:04, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
- Fair enough. I guess I am used to regular citizendium pages where changes you don't like can quickly be undone. Probably best to ask that this page be locked right away and a draft page started, that way no danger of non-EC members editing it by mistake. David Finn 07:28, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
- I do not think that locking the page is needed. Unwanted edits can easily be reverted. --Peter Schmitt 10:13, 30 October 2010 (UTC)