Japanese militarism: Difference between revisions
imported>Howard C. Berkowitz (New page: {{subpages}} While Japan has always had a strong individual warrior tradition (e.g., bushido), '''Japanese militarism''' primarily refers to the increasingly important role of ...) |
imported>Howard C. Berkowitz No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{subpages}} | {{subpages}} | ||
{{TOC|right}} | |||
While [[Japan]] has always had a strong individual [[warrior]] tradition (e.g., [[bushido]]), '''Japanese militarism''' primarily refers to the increasingly important role of the organized military in government, beginning with the [[Meiji Restoration]] of 1838. Radical military officers had a considerable role in starting [[World War Two in the Pacific]], particularly in the 1920-1940 period. While there is much historical work on ''what'' these officers did, there has been much less analysis on ''why'' the Japanese system of government could be so affected by them. One reviewer summarizes theories that include:<ref>{{citation | While [[Japan]] has always had a strong individual [[warrior]] tradition (e.g., [[bushido]]), '''Japanese militarism''' primarily refers to the increasingly important role of the organized military in government, beginning with the [[Meiji Restoration]] of 1838. Radical military officers had a considerable role in starting [[World War Two in the Pacific]], particularly in the 1920-1940 period. While there is much historical work on ''what'' these officers did, there has been much less analysis on ''why'' the Japanese system of government could be so affected by them. One reviewer summarizes theories that include:<ref>{{citation | ||
| url = http://sunzi.lib.hku.hk/hkjo/view/7/700204.pdf | | url = http://sunzi.lib.hku.hk/hkjo/view/7/700204.pdf | ||
| Line 13: | Line 14: | ||
While the usual meaning of the term deals with matters prior to 1945, [[Edwin Hoyt]] and others argue that there may be a post-1945 trend toward militarism. They argue that Article 9 of the postwar Constitution, banning war as an instrument of national policy, has not been fully effective. <ref name=Hoyt>{{citation | While the usual meaning of the term deals with matters prior to 1945, [[Edwin Hoyt]] and others argue that there may be a post-1945 trend toward militarism. They argue that Article 9 of the postwar Constitution, banning war as an instrument of national policy, has not been fully effective. <ref name=Hoyt>{{citation | ||
| title = The Militarists: the Rise of Japanese Militarism since WWII | | title = The Militarists: the Rise of Japanese Militarism since WWII | ||
| author = [[Edwin Hoyt|Edwin T. Hoyt]] | | author = [[Edwin Hoyt|Edwin T. Hoyt]] | ||
| isbn = 0917657179 | | isbn = 0917657179 | ||
| publisher = Donald I. Fine | year = 1985}}</ref> | | publisher = Donald I. Fine | year = 1985}}</ref> | ||
==Early history== | |||
==Meiji era== | |||
==Taisho era== | |||
==Showa era== | |||
==Post-1945== | |||
==References== | ==References== | ||
{{reflist}} | {{reflist}} | ||
Revision as of 13:49, 3 September 2010
While Japan has always had a strong individual warrior tradition (e.g., bushido), Japanese militarism primarily refers to the increasingly important role of the organized military in government, beginning with the Meiji Restoration of 1838. Radical military officers had a considerable role in starting World War Two in the Pacific, particularly in the 1920-1940 period. While there is much historical work on what these officers did, there has been much less analysis on why the Japanese system of government could be so affected by them. One reviewer summarizes theories that include:[1]
- "A breakdown of the decision-making processes in the civilian and military sectors;
- an internal response to external traditions
- poor leadership
- the inherent Japanese military tradition
- a reaction against urbanization
- the plot or plan thesis versus the drift-into-war thesis.
While the usual meaning of the term deals with matters prior to 1945, Edwin Hoyt and others argue that there may be a post-1945 trend toward militarism. They argue that Article 9 of the postwar Constitution, banning war as an instrument of national policy, has not been fully effective. [2]
Early history
Meiji era
Taisho era
Showa era
Post-1945
References
- ↑ Sandra T. Jamison, "The Rise of Militarism in Prewar Japan: A Critical Review", Chung Chi Journal
- ↑ Edwin T. Hoyt (1985), The Militarists: the Rise of Japanese Militarism since WWII, Donald I. Fine, ISBN 0917657179