Talk:Melanocortins and appetite: Difference between revisions
imported>Nancy Sabatier No edit summary |
imported>Gareth Leng |
||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
Hi guys, your reference list needs to be developped a bit more, have a look at what the other group have done, it'll give you an idea of how much they already put in. Also, you should start thinking about your introduction and plan for your main article. [[User:Nancy Sabatier|Nancy Sabatier]] 16:31, 14 October 2010 (UTC) | Hi guys, your reference list needs to be developped a bit more, have a look at what the other group have done, it'll give you an idea of how much they already put in. Also, you should start thinking about your introduction and plan for your main article. [[User:Nancy Sabatier|Nancy Sabatier]] 16:31, 14 October 2010 (UTC) | ||
The plan looks sensible; you do need to keep a sharp eye out for key experimental studies; I'd suggest that you use the bibliography page to capture key details of experimental studies of particular significance; whether and how you incorporate those in the main article you can decide later. Without more detail and seeing what you're doing I can't give any better feedback at this stage.[[User:Gareth Leng|Gareth Leng]] 14:29, 25 October 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 08:29, 25 October 2010
- Jessica Ivy 13:13, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
- Ruth Callaghan 13:14, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
- Cadi M. J. Irvine 13:16, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
Hello. here is a link to an article- haven't read it yet but looks like a nice intro to the glamorous world of melanocortins:
[1] article 1
Jessica Ivy 13:49, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
- Jessica, remember to use the Bibliography page for references. Please write the whole ref with author names, year, title, journal, vol, and PubMed link if available.
Nancy Sabatier 17:02, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
Related articles
You'll see that on the Related articles subpage I've placed links to all the articles from the other groups this year - and also to last year's articles. Good luck with this.Gareth Leng 16:01, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
Hi guys, your reference list needs to be developped a bit more, have a look at what the other group have done, it'll give you an idea of how much they already put in. Also, you should start thinking about your introduction and plan for your main article. Nancy Sabatier 16:31, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
The plan looks sensible; you do need to keep a sharp eye out for key experimental studies; I'd suggest that you use the bibliography page to capture key details of experimental studies of particular significance; whether and how you incorporate those in the main article you can decide later. Without more detail and seeing what you're doing I can't give any better feedback at this stage.Gareth Leng 14:29, 25 October 2010 (UTC)