Talk:Branch Davidians: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Ed Poor (Am I taking this too personally or on the right track? Give me much guidance) |
imported>D. Matt Innis (keep up the good work!) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
On the other hand, if this issue is "too controversial" for a new writer such as me to attempt, warn me off. (LOL, don't send constables with warrants after me: I'll go quietly. ;-) --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 18:06, 26 January 2009 (UTC) | On the other hand, if this issue is "too controversial" for a new writer such as me to attempt, warn me off. (LOL, don't send constables with warrants after me: I'll go quietly. ;-) --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 18:06, 26 January 2009 (UTC) | ||
:New writer :-) That's funny! No, you're doing fine Ed. The important thing is that you recognize the bias and work toward correcting it. Of course, when someone asks you about it, be [[CZ:Constabulary Blocking Procedures#Rapid Response Rules and Procedures|aware of behavior issues that can get you blocked]] so I won't have to shoot you ;-) [[User:D. Matt Innis|D. Matt Innis]] 18:22, 26 January 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 12:22, 26 January 2009
In the interests of neutrality, I must admit that so far I have leaned heavily on the anti-government point of view. To balance this criticism, don't we need to say more about the pro-government viewpoint? The last thing I want is an unbalanced, biased article.
On the other hand, if this issue is "too controversial" for a new writer such as me to attempt, warn me off. (LOL, don't send constables with warrants after me: I'll go quietly. ;-) --Ed Poor 18:06, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
- New writer :-) That's funny! No, you're doing fine Ed. The important thing is that you recognize the bias and work toward correcting it. Of course, when someone asks you about it, be aware of behavior issues that can get you blocked so I won't have to shoot you ;-) D. Matt Innis 18:22, 26 January 2009 (UTC)