Urinary catheterization: Difference between revisions
imported>Charles G. Hansen m (→Removal of urinary catheters: Spelling -- changed "tow cycles" to "two cycles") |
imported>Robert Badgett |
||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
==Removal of urinary catheters== | ==Removal of urinary catheters== | ||
{{main|urinary retention}} | {{main|urinary retention}} | ||
Retained volumes of more than 900 ml reduced chance of successful removal of the catheter.<ref name="pmid2641206">{{cite journal |author=Taube M, Gajraj H |title=Trial without catheter following acute retention of urine |journal=Br J Urol |volume=63 |issue=2 |pages=180–2 |year=1989 |month=February |pmid=2641206 |doi= |url= |issn=}}</ref> | |||
{| class="wikitable" align="right" | |||
|+ Selected [[randomized controlled trial]]s of [[adrenergic alpha-antagonist]]s prior to removal of a catheter for acute [[urinary retention]] in men.<ref name="pmid15679793">{{cite journal| author=Lucas MG, Stephenson TP, Nargund V| title=Tamsulosin in the management of patients in acute urinary retention from benign prostatic hyperplasia. | journal=BJU Int | year= 2005 | volume= 95 | issue= 3 | pages= 354-7 | pmid=15679793 | |||
| url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&retmode=ref&cmd=prlinks&id=15679793 | doi=10.1111/j.1464-410X.2005.05299.x }} <!--Formatted by http://sumsearch.uthscsa.edu/cite/--></ref><ref name="pmid15667868">{{cite journal| author=McNeill SA, Hargreave TB, Roehrborn CG, Alfaur study group| title=Alfuzosin 10 mg once daily in the management of acute urinary retention: results of a double-blind placebo-controlled study. | journal=Urology | year= 2005 | volume= 65 | issue= 1 | pages= 83-9; discussion 89-90 | pmid=15667868 | |||
| url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&retmode=ref&cmd=prlinks&id=15667868 | doi=10.1016/j.urology.2004.07.042 }} <!--Formatted by http://sumsearch.uthscsa.edu/cite/--></ref><ref name="pmid12361896">{{cite journal| author=Shah T, Palit V, Biyani S, Elmasry Y, Puri R, Flannigan GM| title=Randomised, placebo controlled, double blind study of alfuzosin SR in patients undergoing trial without catheter following acute urinary retention. | journal=Eur Urol | year= 2002 | volume= 42 | issue= 4 | pages= 329-32; discussion 332 | pmid=12361896 | |||
| url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&retmode=ref&cmd=prlinks&id=12361896 }} <!--Formatted by http://sumsearch.uthscsa.edu/cite/--></ref> | |||
! Trial!! [[Adrenergic alpha-antagonist]]!!Result | |||
|- | |||
| Lucas<ref name="pmid15679793"><br/>2002|| [[Tamsulosin]] 0.4 mg once daily for ≤ 8 days|| Benefit | |||
|- | |||
| Alfaur study<ref name="pmid15667868"/><br/>2005|| [[Alfuzosin]] 10 mg once daily for 3 days|| Benefit | |||
|- | |||
| Tibung (unpublished)<br/>2006||[[Alfuzosin]] 10 mg once daily for 2 days||Insignificant benefit | |||
|- | |||
| Shah<ref name="pmid12361896"/><br/>2005||[[Alfuzosin]] 5 mg twice daily for 36 hours and then again for 2 weeks<br/>([[Alfuzosin]] half life is 10 hours)||No benefit | |||
|} | |||
[[Adrenergic alpha-antagonist]]s might be effective (residual volume of <200 ml after removeal of catheter) according to a [[systematic review]] by the [[Cochrane Collaboration]].<ref name="pmid19821385">{{cite journal| author=Zeif HJ, Subramonian K| title=Alpha blockers prior to removal of a catheter for acute urinary retention in adult men. | journal=Cochrane Database Syst Rev | year= 2009 | volume= | issue= 4 | pages= CD006744 | pmid=19821385 | |||
| url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&retmode=ref&cmd=prlinks&id=19821385 | doi=10.1002/14651858.CD006744.pub2 }} <!--Formatted by http://sumsearch.uthscsa.edu/cite/--></ref> This review found four trials of [[alfuzosin]] (10 mg once daily or 5 mg twice daily)<ref name="pmid15667868">{{cite journal| author=McNeill SA, Hargreave TB, Roehrborn CG, Alfaur study group| title=Alfuzosin 10 mg once daily in the management of acute urinary retention: results of a double-blind placebo-controlled study. | journal=Urology | year= 2005 | volume= 65 | issue= 1 | pages= 83-9; discussion 89-90 | pmid=15667868 | |||
| url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&retmode=ref&cmd=prlinks&id=15667868 | doi=10.1016/j.urology.2004.07.042 }} <!--Formatted by http://sumsearch.uthscsa.edu/cite/--></ref> and one of [[tamsulosin]] (0.4 mg once daily)<ref name="pmid15679793">{{cite journal| author=Lucas MG, Stephenson TP, Nargund V| title=Tamsulosin in the management of patients in acute urinary retention from benign prostatic hyperplasia. | journal=BJU Int | year= 2005 | volume= 95 | issue= 3 | pages= 354-7 | pmid=15679793 | |||
| url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&retmode=ref&cmd=prlinks&id=15679793 | doi=10.1111/j.1464-410X.2005.05299.x }} <!--Formatted by http://sumsearch.uthscsa.edu/cite/--></ref>. The [[adrenergic alpha-antagonist]]s were started 24 to 72 hours before trial without a catheter (TWOC) in 4 trials and 8 days prior in one trial. | |||
Removing the catheter at midnight might be the most effective determinant according to a [[systematic review]] by the [[Cochrane Collaboration]].<ref name="pmid17443536">{{cite journal |author=Griffiths R, Fernandez R |title=Strategies for the removal of short-term indwelling urethral catheters in adults |journal=Cochrane Database Syst Rev |volume= |issue=2 |pages=CD004011 |year=2007 |pmid=17443536 |doi=10.1002/14651858.CD004011.pub3 |url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004011.pub3 |issn=}}</ref> | |||
Using intermittent catheterisation for postoperative patients was "associated with a lower risk of bacteriuria than indwelling urethral catheterisation, but might be more costly...limits catheterisation to those people who definitely need it."<ref name="pmid16034924">{{cite journal |author=Niël-Weise BS, van den Broek PJ |title=Urinary catheter policies for short-term bladder drainage in adults |journal=Cochrane Database Syst Rev |volume= |issue=3 |pages=CD004203 |year=2005 |pmid=16034924 |doi=10.1002/14651858.CD004203.pub2 |url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004203.pub2 |issn=}}</ref> | |||
Regarding how long to wait until a voiding without catheter trial, "a tendency for later removal to be associated with fewer short-term voiding problems, but increasing risk of urinary tract infection, more dissatisfaction and longer hospital stay" according to a [[systematic review]] by the [[Cochrane Collaboration]].<ref name="pmid17443536">{{cite journal |author=Griffiths R, Fernandez R |title=Strategies for the removal of short-term indwelling urethral catheters in adults |journal=Cochrane Database Syst Rev |volume= |issue=2 |pages=CD004011 |year=2007 |pmid=17443536 |doi=10.1002/14651858.CD004011.pub3 |url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004011.pub3 |issn=}}</ref> | |||
Intermittent clamping of catheters is of uncertain benefit.<ref name="pmid16234728">{{cite journal |author=Fernandez RS, Griffiths RD |title=Clamping short-term indwelling catheters: a systematic review of the evidence |journal=J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs |volume=32 |issue=5 |pages=329–36 |year=2005 |pmid=16234728 |doi= |url=http://meta.wkhealth.com/pt/pt-core/template-journal/lwwgateway/media/landingpage.htm?issn=1071-5754&volume=32&issue=5&spage=329 |issn=}}</ref> | Intermittent clamping of catheters is of uncertain benefit.<ref name="pmid16234728">{{cite journal |author=Fernandez RS, Griffiths RD |title=Clamping short-term indwelling catheters: a systematic review of the evidence |journal=J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs |volume=32 |issue=5 |pages=329–36 |year=2005 |pmid=16234728 |doi= |url=http://meta.wkhealth.com/pt/pt-core/template-journal/lwwgateway/media/landingpage.htm?issn=1071-5754&volume=32&issue=5&spage=329 |issn=}}</ref> This consists of two cycles of clamping the tube for two hours and releasing it for five minutes, to help restore bladder muscle tone. Since the act of removal often stimulates a strong urge to void, the patient should be given a bedpan or urinal before starting to remove the catheter. <ref name=mCCP>{{citation | title = Manual of Critical Care Procedures | ||
| publisher = Springhouse | author = Bass LS ''et al.'' | year = 1994 | isbn = 0-87434-691-6 }}, p. 425</ref> | |||
==References== | ==References== | ||
<references/> | <references/> |
Revision as of 08:50, 30 October 2009
In medicine, urinary catheterization is "employment or passage of a catheter into the urinary bladder (urethral catheterization) or kidney (ureteral catheterization) for therapeutic or diagnostic purposes.[1]
Complications
Urinary tract infection
Regarding short-term catheterization:
- Antiseptic impregnated catheters reduce urinary tract infections according to a systematic review by the Cochrane Collaboration.[2]
- "Condom catheters is less likely to lead to bacteriuria, symptomatic UTI, or death than the use of indwelling catheters. This protection is especially apparent in men without dementia" according to a randomized controlled trial.[3]
- Suprapubic catheters "have advantages over indwelling catheters in respect of bacteriuria, recatheterisation and discomfort."[4]
Regarding long-term catheterization and prevention of urinary tract infections:
- It is not clear what type of catheterization is best according to at systematic review by the Cochrane Collaboration.[5]
- It is not clear what methods of intermittent catheterization are best according to at systematic review by the Cochrane Collaboration.[6]
Removal of urinary catheters
Retained volumes of more than 900 ml reduced chance of successful removal of the catheter.[7]
Trial | Adrenergic alpha-antagonist | Result |
---|---|---|
LucasCite error: Closing </ref> missing for <ref> tag This review found four trials of alfuzosin (10 mg once daily or 5 mg twice daily)[9] and one of tamsulosin (0.4 mg once daily)[8]. The adrenergic alpha-antagonists were started 24 to 72 hours before trial without a catheter (TWOC) in 4 trials and 8 days prior in one trial.
Removing the catheter at midnight might be the most effective determinant according to a systematic review by the Cochrane Collaboration.[11] Using intermittent catheterisation for postoperative patients was "associated with a lower risk of bacteriuria than indwelling urethral catheterisation, but might be more costly...limits catheterisation to those people who definitely need it."[4] Regarding how long to wait until a voiding without catheter trial, "a tendency for later removal to be associated with fewer short-term voiding problems, but increasing risk of urinary tract infection, more dissatisfaction and longer hospital stay" according to a systematic review by the Cochrane Collaboration.[11] Intermittent clamping of catheters is of uncertain benefit.[12] This consists of two cycles of clamping the tube for two hours and releasing it for five minutes, to help restore bladder muscle tone. Since the act of removal often stimulates a strong urge to void, the patient should be given a bedpan or urinal before starting to remove the catheter. [13] References
|