Talk:Hydrodesulfurization/Draft: Difference between revisions
imported>Paul Wormer (→Title: new section) |
imported>Paul Wormer (→Title) |
||
Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
Since other hydrogenolysis reactions are discussed, IMHO a better name would be "Industrial hydrogenolysis".--[[User:Paul Wormer|Paul Wormer]] 21:14, 16 March 2009 (UTC) | Since other hydrogenolysis reactions are discussed, IMHO a better name would be "Industrial hydrogenolysis".--[[User:Paul Wormer|Paul Wormer]] 21:14, 16 March 2009 (UTC) | ||
:PS David asked me to approve this article, so I read it. But now I see that there are already three editors approving it. For the record: I approve it too. --[[User:Paul Wormer|Paul Wormer]] 21:20, 16 March 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 15:20, 16 March 2009
NOTICE, please do not remove from top of page. | |
I released this article to Wikipedia. In particular, the identical text that appears there is of my sole authorship. Therefore, no credit for Wikipedia content on the Citizendium applies. | |
Check the history of edits to see who inserted this notice. |
This article came from Wikipedia
I was not the original creator of the Wikipedia article of the same name but, as a Wikipedian, I rewrote 95% or more of it, added a flow diagram that I drew, and expanded the article.
I have uploaded exactly it as it now exists on Wikipedia, but will now proceed to clean it up, do some rewording and what ever else is needed to make it suitable for Citizendium. This may take me a few hours. - Milton Beychok 15:45, 31 January 2008 (CST)
Nominate for approval
I nominated this article for approval. However, I must note that I created and uploaded a single image for this article, thus others will need to concur. David E. Volk 17:41, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
- David, that is a very nice image of the pyridine hydrodenitrogenation reaction. As the originator of this article, I think that I am allowed to be one of the three approval nominators and so I've added my name in the Metadata template. Thanks David and Howard. Milton Beychok 18:02, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
Wearing chemical-stained Engineering Editor hat
That's a very very nice description of the process. Would that more things were that clear. I vote for Approval, and and have not edited the article. Howard C. Berkowitz 17:47, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
- Great! Maybe the three of you could do a group approval. I was just chatting with Milt by email about sidestepping potentially negative PR by making sure that we don't have a single Editor A approving every article written by Editor B, regardless of either's expertise. Group approvals should help with that. --Joe Quick 18:06, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
- Wow! Was I just not paying attention or did you guys figure out what I was going to say before I even finished typing? --Joe Quick 18:08, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
- I too want psychic editing. Joe, at least it is possible to have a group for this topic. What do we do for the groups with one active editor, or, even worse, when the only active editor is a main author? Frustrating. I'd rather get some things approved and worry about the hypothetical PR aspect if it comes up. There's enough with no one at all to approve. Howard C. Berkowitz 18:21, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
ESP editors
We would all like to apply for ESP editors now that we've proven the ability. David E. Volk 18:12, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
Title
Since other hydrogenolysis reactions are discussed, IMHO a better name would be "Industrial hydrogenolysis".--Paul Wormer 21:14, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
- PS David asked me to approve this article, so I read it. But now I see that there are already three editors approving it. For the record: I approve it too. --Paul Wormer 21:20, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
- Article with Definition
- Engineering Category Check
- Chemistry Category Check
- Nonstub Articles
- Advanced Articles
- Internal Articles
- Engineering Nonstub Articles
- Engineering Advanced Articles
- Engineering Internal Articles
- Chemistry Nonstub Articles
- Chemistry Advanced Articles
- Chemistry Internal Articles
- Chemical Engineering tag