Talk:Higgs boson: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>John R. Brews (→Section on mechanism: new section) |
imported>John R. Brews (→Section on mechanism: rewrite made) |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
The section [[Higgs boson#The Higgs Mechanism|The Higgs Mechanism]] is opaque to anyone. It doesn't point out the role of the Higgs boson, nor how the formulas contain it. [[User:John R. Brews|John R. Brews]] 19:30, 5 July 2012 (UTC) | The section [[Higgs boson#The Higgs Mechanism|The Higgs Mechanism]] is opaque to anyone. It doesn't point out the role of the Higgs boson, nor how the formulas contain it. [[User:John R. Brews|John R. Brews]] 19:30, 5 July 2012 (UTC) | ||
I've removed the mathematical obfuscation and substituted a verbal description with a source. [[User:John R. Brews|John R. Brews]] 16:28, 6 July 2012 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 10:28, 6 July 2012
"The Higgs boson is the last particle in the Standard Model of particle physics to be observed"
- So all the different leptons, quarks, antileptons and antiquarks have been observed? Peter Jackson 16:12, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
- Peter: I don't know. My wording simply reflected what was written before. Perhaps the definition and this lead sentence should be changed. The lead sentence is easy: change "last" to "latest". The definition: "The last particle, first proposed by Peter Higgs, in the Standard Model of particle physics which has not been observed." clearly is wrong, and anyway it is silly to use this approach to identify a particle simply by when it was observed. John R. Brews 16:17, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
- I've undertaken to change both intro and definition. John R. Brews 16:26, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
Section on mechanism
The section The Higgs Mechanism is opaque to anyone. It doesn't point out the role of the Higgs boson, nor how the formulas contain it. John R. Brews 19:30, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
I've removed the mathematical obfuscation and substituted a verbal description with a source. John R. Brews 16:28, 6 July 2012 (UTC)