CZ Talk:Function: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Larry Sanger No edit summary |
imported>Chris Day No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Subpages ''are'' a slam dunk, if you mean to say that they're approved. They're done did ''approved.'' It's now just a matter of implementation! But yes, we do need to get this passed off by the Council. --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 12:46, 22 August 2007 (CDT) | Subpages ''are'' a slam dunk, if you mean to say that they're approved. They're done did ''approved.'' It's now just a matter of implementation! But yes, we do need to get this passed off by the Council. --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 12:46, 22 August 2007 (CDT) | ||
:This can be a test run for putting together a proposal for a new subpages name. Do you have a draft protocol layed out already? [[User:Chris Day|Chris Day]] [[User talk:Chris Day|(talk)]] 12:50, 22 August 2007 (CDT) | |||
Latest revision as of 11:50, 22 August 2007
Isn't "function" an overbroad name for "different functions attributed to a particular gene or protein"? --Larry Sanger 22:08, 21 August 2007 (CDT)
- Possibly, i was thinking gene function too, but was trying to keep it to one word for now. We'll put it up for the editorial councils approval once we have tried it out. Assuming subpages are now a slam dunk. Chris Day (talk) 22:12, 21 August 2007 (CDT)
Subpages are a slam dunk, if you mean to say that they're approved. They're done did approved. It's now just a matter of implementation! But yes, we do need to get this passed off by the Council. --Larry Sanger 12:46, 22 August 2007 (CDT)