Talk:Solid harmonics: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Jitse Niesen
(hbar in orbital angular momentum)
imported>Paul Wormer
No edit summary
Line 15: Line 15:


:Hi Paul. Is the definition of the orbital angular momentum <math>\mathbf{L}</math> (second displayed equation) correct? The factor <math>\hbar</math> seems out of place. -- [[User:Jitse Niesen|Jitse Niesen]] 08:01, 24 August 2007 (CDT)
:Hi Paul. Is the definition of the orbital angular momentum <math>\mathbf{L}</math> (second displayed equation) correct? The factor <math>\hbar</math> seems out of place. -- [[User:Jitse Niesen|Jitse Niesen]] 08:01, 24 August 2007 (CDT)
::Hallo Jitse, I don't see what is wrong. Classically :
::::<math> \mathbf{L} = \mathbf{r}\times \mathbf{p}
</math>
::QM:
::::<math>
\mathbf{p} \rightarrow - i\hbar \mathbf{\nabla}, \qquad \mathbf{r} \rightarrow \mathbf{r}
</math>
::What do you think it should be? --[[User:Paul Wormer|Paul Wormer]] 09:21, 24 August 2007 (CDT)

Revision as of 08:21, 24 August 2007


Article Checklist for "Solid harmonics"
Workgroup category or categories Physics Workgroup, Mathematics Workgroup [Categories OK]
Article status Developing article: beyond a stub, but incomplete
Underlinked article? Yes
Basic cleanup done? No
Checklist last edited by --Paul Wormer 04:18, 22 August 2007 (CDT)

To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.





This article (my own article from Wikipedia) gave LaTeX errors which I worked around. Added to WP version section on relation to regular and irregular solid harmonics and references. --Paul Wormer 04:18, 22 August 2007 (CDT)

Hi Paul. Is the definition of the orbital angular momentum (second displayed equation) correct? The factor seems out of place. -- Jitse Niesen 08:01, 24 August 2007 (CDT)
Hallo Jitse, I don't see what is wrong. Classically :
QM:
What do you think it should be? --Paul Wormer 09:21, 24 August 2007 (CDT)