CZ Talk:Bibliography: Difference between revisions
imported>Larry Sanger No edit summary |
imported>Jitse Niesen (Why no popular and historical sources?) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Hoping Richard Jensen might help us out here. --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 07:31, 19 July 2007 (CDT) | Hoping Richard Jensen might help us out here. --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 07:31, 19 July 2007 (CDT) | ||
== Why no popular and historical sources? == | |||
This page contains two recommendations that I have my doubts about. Firstly, it says "Popular sources are usually not included unless they are influential in their own right, or better sources are lacking." What's the reason behind this? It does seem to be in contradiction with "The bibliography is most useful […] for preparing a written report like a college term paper or report for a high school AP course" (by the way, I've no idea what AP means; an American term I guess). Non-popular sources on things like quantum mechanics will be hard to understand for high school or college students. | |||
Secondly, it says "Outdated or discredited sources should be avoided". However, I think that we should explicitly allow historical sources. For instance, I think the bibliography for evolution should contain Darwin's ''The Origin of Species'', even though it is outdated (I haven't actually read the book, but I'm pretty sure it's outdated). -- [[User:Jitse Niesen|Jitse Niesen]] 07:49, 2 September 2007 (CDT) | |||
Revision as of 06:49, 2 September 2007
Hoping Richard Jensen might help us out here. --Larry Sanger 07:31, 19 July 2007 (CDT)
Why no popular and historical sources?
This page contains two recommendations that I have my doubts about. Firstly, it says "Popular sources are usually not included unless they are influential in their own right, or better sources are lacking." What's the reason behind this? It does seem to be in contradiction with "The bibliography is most useful […] for preparing a written report like a college term paper or report for a high school AP course" (by the way, I've no idea what AP means; an American term I guess). Non-popular sources on things like quantum mechanics will be hard to understand for high school or college students.
Secondly, it says "Outdated or discredited sources should be avoided". However, I think that we should explicitly allow historical sources. For instance, I think the bibliography for evolution should contain Darwin's The Origin of Species, even though it is outdated (I haven't actually read the book, but I'm pretty sure it's outdated). -- Jitse Niesen 07:49, 2 September 2007 (CDT)