Talk:Epistemology: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Andrew Chong
imported>Larry Sanger
Line 13: Line 13:
== Stub ==
== Stub ==
I am merely making a stub here. I will not cling to it, since I am not a professional philosopher.[[User:Daniel Demaret|Daniel Demaret]] 06:38, 8 May 2007 (CDT)
I am merely making a stub here. I will not cling to it, since I am not a professional philosopher.[[User:Daniel Demaret|Daniel Demaret]] 06:38, 8 May 2007 (CDT)
Good, because it needs ''a lot'' of work. --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 14:32, 3 August 2007 (CDT)


== Combining topics under history ==
== Combining topics under history ==


It seems that the sections from Hellenistic views to Modern Times should be combined under a history section. Does anyone agree? [[User:Andrew Chong|Andrew Chong]] 13:05, 3 August 2007 (CDT)
It seems that the sections from Hellenistic views to Modern Times should be combined under a history section. Does anyone agree? [[User:Andrew Chong|Andrew Chong]] 13:05, 3 August 2007 (CDT)

Revision as of 13:32, 3 August 2007


Article Checklist for "Epistemology"
Workgroup category or categories Philosophy Workgroup [Categories OK]
Article status Developing article: beyond a stub, but incomplete
Underlinked article? No
Basic cleanup done? Yes
Checklist last edited by --Todd Coles 09:58, 3 August 2007 (CDT)

To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.





Stub

I am merely making a stub here. I will not cling to it, since I am not a professional philosopher.Daniel Demaret 06:38, 8 May 2007 (CDT)

Good, because it needs a lot of work. --Larry Sanger 14:32, 3 August 2007 (CDT)

Combining topics under history

It seems that the sections from Hellenistic views to Modern Times should be combined under a history section. Does anyone agree? Andrew Chong 13:05, 3 August 2007 (CDT)