Talk:Prime Number Theorem: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>David E. Volk (ln(x) or log<sub>e</sub>(x) please) |
imported>Paul Wormer |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
== log vs ln == | == log vs ln == | ||
Shouldn't the equation be written as ln(x) or log<sub>e</sub>(x) if it is a natural log? [[User:David E. Volk|David E. Volk]] 15:02, 12 November 2008 (UTC) | Shouldn't the equation be written as ln(x) or log<sub>e</sub>(x) if it is a natural log? [[User:David E. Volk|David E. Volk]] 15:02, 12 November 2008 (UTC) | ||
:David, I agree, see [[Talk:Exponential_function|here]] --[[User:Paul Wormer|Paul Wormer]] 16:04, 12 November 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 10:04, 12 November 2008
new page - improve!
I started this article from material taken from Prime number. Some of what's currently in this article should probably go instead in an article about the Riemann zeta function. Hard to know how detailed to get on this page - it's serious mathematics. - Greg Martin 22:14, 29 April 2007 (CDT)
Capital letters
Perhaps the page name should be "Prime number theorem" rather than "Prime Number Theorem". --Catherine Woodgold 21:07, 30 April 2007 (CDT)
log vs ln
Shouldn't the equation be written as ln(x) or loge(x) if it is a natural log? David E. Volk 15:02, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
- David, I agree, see here --Paul Wormer 16:04, 12 November 2008 (UTC)