John C. Calhoun: Difference between revisions
imported>Richard Jensen (add) |
imported>Richard Jensen (add details and links) |
||
Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
==Slavery== | ==Slavery== | ||
Calhoun | On February 6, 1837, John C. Calhoun took the floor of the Senate to declare that slavery was a "positive good." Senator William Rives of Virginia had referred to slavery as an evil that might become a "lesser evil" in some circumstances. Calhoun believed that conceded too much to the abolitionists: "I take higher ground. I hold that in the present state of civilization, where two races of different origin, and distinguished by color, and other physical differences, as well as intellectual, are brought together, the relation now existing in the slaveholding States between the two, is, instead of an evil, a good—a positive good. . . . I hold then, that there never has yet existed a wealthy and civilized society in which one portion of the community did not, in point of fact, live on the labor of the other." A year later in the Senate (January 10, 1838), Calhoun repeated this defense of slavery as a "positive good": "Many in the South once believed that it was a moral and political evil; that folly and delusion are gone; we see it now in its true light, and regard it as the most safe and stable basis for free institutions in the world." Calhoun rejected the belief of Southern moderates such as [[Henry Clay]] that all Americans could agree on the "opinion and feeling" that slavery was wrong, although they might disagree on the most practicable way to respond to that great wrong. | ||
==Political philosophy== | ==Political philosophy== | ||
===Agrarian republicanism=== | |||
Cheek (2001) distinguishes between two strands of American republican thought—the puritan tradition, based in New England, and the agrarian or South Atlantic tradition. Cheek argues that Calhoun is best understood as a representative of the South Atlantic tradition of agrarian republicanism. While the New England tradition stressed a politically centralized enforcement of moral and religious norms to secure civic virtue, the South Atlantic tradition relied on a decentralized moral and religious order based on the idea of subsidiarity (or localism). Cheek locates the fundamental principles of Calhoun's republicanism in the "Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions" (1798) written by [[Thomas Jefferson]] and [[James Madison]]. Calhoun emphasizes the primacy of the idea of subsidiarity: popular rule is best expressed in local communities that are nearly autonomous while serving as units of a larger society. | |||
===Concurrent majority=== | |||
Calhoun's basic concern for protecting the diverse interests of local communities is expressed in his chief contribution to political science—the idea of a concurrent majority as distinguished from a numerical majority. According to the principle of a numerical majority, the will of the more numerous citizens should always rule, regardless of the burdens on the minority. Such a principle tends toward a consolidation of power in which the interests of the absolute majority always prevail over those of the minority. Calhoun believed that the great achievement of the American constitution was in checking the tyranny of a numerical majority through institutional procedures that required a concurrent majority, such that each important interest in the community must consent to the actions of government. To secure a concurrent majority, those interests that have a numerical majority must compromise with the interests that are in the minority. A concurrent majority requires a unanimous consent of all the major interests in a community, which is the only sure way of preventing majority tyranny. This idea supported Calhoun's doctrine of interposition or nullification, in which the state governments could refuse to enforce or comply with a policy of the Federal government that threatened the vital interests of the states. | |||
===''Disquisition on Government''=== | |||
The ''Disquisition on Government'' was a book that incorporated Calhoun's reasoned views on government as seen from the point of view of the permanent minority (the South). Begun in 1843, and virtually finished in 1848, it elaborates the doctrine of his South Carolina Exposition and Protest. Its keynote is the idea of a concurrent majority. Simple majority government always results in despotism over the minority unless some way is devised to secure the assent of all classes, sections, and interests. The argument is close-knit and convincing if one accepts the belief of Calhoun that the states retain absolute sovereignty over the Constitution and can do with it as they wish. This doctrine could be made effective by nullification. But Calhoun believed that the clear recognition of rights on the part of the states on the one hand and of the national majority on the other would prevent matters ever coming to a crisis. South Carolina and other southern states, in the three decades preceding the Civil War, had provided legislatures in which the vested interests of land and slaves dominated in the upper houses, while the popular will of the numerical majority prevailed in the lower houses. This was done in conscious acceptance of the doctrine of the ''Disquisition''. | The ''Disquisition on Government'' was a book that incorporated Calhoun's reasoned views on government as seen from the point of view of the permanent minority (the South). Begun in 1843, and virtually finished in 1848, it elaborates the doctrine of his South Carolina Exposition and Protest. Its keynote is the idea of a concurrent majority. Simple majority government always results in despotism over the minority unless some way is devised to secure the assent of all classes, sections, and interests. The argument is close-knit and convincing if one accepts the belief of Calhoun that the states retain absolute sovereignty over the Constitution and can do with it as they wish. This doctrine could be made effective by nullification. But Calhoun believed that the clear recognition of rights on the part of the states on the one hand and of the national majority on the other would prevent matters ever coming to a crisis. South Carolina and other southern states, in the three decades preceding the Civil War, had provided legislatures in which the vested interests of land and slaves dominated in the upper houses, while the popular will of the numerical majority prevailed in the lower houses. This was done in conscious acceptance of the doctrine of the ''Disquisition''. | ||
The ''Disquisition'' was published shortly after his death as was his other book, ''Discourse on the Constitution and Government of the United States.'' | The ''Disquisition'' was published shortly after his death as was his other book, ''Discourse on the Constitution and Government of the United States.'' | ||
==Bibliography== | ==Bibliography== | ||
* Bartlett, Irving H. ''John C. Calhoun: A Biography'' (1994) | * Bartlett, Irving H. ''John C. Calhoun: A Biography'' (1994), 413pp | ||
* Cheek, H. Lee, Jr. ''Calhoun and Popular Rule: The Political Theory of the Disquisition and Discourse.'' (2001). 202 pp. | * Brown, Guy Story. ''Calhoun's Philosophy of Politics: A Study of A Disquisition on Government'' (2000) 435 pp. [http://books.google.com/books?id=2Qvme4MhhZcC&printsec=frontcover&dq=intitle:Disquisition+intitle:on+intitle:Government&lr=&as_brr=0&sig=0atGUlDSBv07atBNrQ_RqZ0wfx0 excerpt and text search] | ||
* Coit, Margaret, L ''John C. Calhoun: American Portrait'' 620pp; [http://www.amazon.com/John-C-Calhoun-American-Portrait/dp/0877971854 excerpt and text search] | * Capers, Gerald M. ''John C. Calhoun, Opportunist: A Reappraisal'' (1960) [http://www.questia.com/read/14322273?title=John%20C.%20Calhoun%2c%20Opportunist%3a%20A%20Reappraisal online edition] | ||
* Cheek, H. Lee, Jr. ''Calhoun and Popular Rule: The Political Theory of the Disquisition and Discourse.'' (2001). 202 pp. [http://www.questia.com/read/106760073?title=Calhoun%20and%20Popular%20Rule%3a%20%20The%20Political%20Theory%20of%20the%20Disquisition%20and%20Discourse online edition] | |||
* Coit, Margaret, L ''John C. Calhoun: American Portrait'' 620pp; prize winning popular history[http://www.amazon.com/John-C-Calhoun-American-Portrait/dp/0877971854 excerpt and text search] | |||
* Ford, Lacy K. Jr. "Inventing the Concurrent Majority: Madison, Calhoun, and the Problem of Majoritarianism in American Political Thought," ''Journal of Southern History'' 60 (1994): 19-58 [http://www.jstor.org/pss/2210719 in JSTOR] | |||
* Ford, Lacy K. Jr. "Republican Ideology in a Slave Society: The Political Economy of John C. Calhoun," ''Journal of Southern History'' 54 (1988): 405-24; [http://www.jstor.org/pss/2208996 in JSTOR] | |||
* Freehling, William W. "Spoilsmen and Interests in the Thought and Career of John C. Calhoun," ''Journal of American History'' 52 (1965): 25-42. [http://www.jstor.org/pss/1901122 in JSTOR] | |||
* Freehling, William W. ''The Road to Disunion: Secessionists at Bay, 1776-1854 - Vol. 1'' (1991), scholarly study [http://www.questia.com/read/94874561?title=The%20Road%20to%20Disunion%3a%20Secessionists%20at%20Bay%2c%201776-1854%20-%20Vol.%201 online edition] | |||
* Niven, John. ''John C. Calhoun and the Price of Union: A Biography'' (1993) [http://www.amazon.com/John-Calhoun-Price-Union-Biography/dp/0807118583/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1212720019&sr=1-2 excerpt and text search] | * Niven, John. ''John C. Calhoun and the Price of Union: A Biography'' (1993) [http://www.amazon.com/John-Calhoun-Price-Union-Biography/dp/0807118583/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1212720019&sr=1-2 excerpt and text search] | ||
* Peterson | |||
* Vajda, Zoltan. "John C. Calhoun's Republicanism Revisited," ''Rhetoric & Public Affairs'', 4#3 Fall 2001, pp. 433-457 in [[Project Muse]] | |||
* Wiltse, Charles M. ''John C. Calhoun,'' 3 vols. (1944-1951), the standard scholarly biography | |||
===Primary sources=== | ===Primary sources=== | ||
* Calhoun, John Caldwell. ''A Disquisition on Government'' edited by Richard Kenner Crallé (1851) 406 pp. [http://books.google.com/books?id=fqwqAAAAMAAJ&printsec=frontcover&dq=intitle:Disquisition+intitle:on+intitle:Government&lr=&as_brr=0 online edition] | * Calhoun, John Caldwell. ''A Disquisition on Government'' edited by Richard Kenner Crallé (1851) 406 pp. [http://books.google.com/books?id=fqwqAAAAMAAJ&printsec=frontcover&dq=intitle:Disquisition+intitle:on+intitle:Government&lr=&as_brr=0 online edition] | ||
* Calhoun, John C. '' John C. Calhoun: Selected Writings and Speeches'' edited by H. Lee Cheek, (2003) [http://www.amazon.com/John-C-Calhoun-Conservative-Leadership/dp/0895261790/ref=sr_1_3?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1212720019&sr=1-3 excerpt and text search] | * Calhoun, John C. '' John C. Calhoun: Selected Writings and Speeches'' edited by H. Lee Cheek, (2003) [http://www.amazon.com/John-C-Calhoun-Conservative-Leadership/dp/0895261790/ref=sr_1_3?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1212720019&sr=1-3 excerpt and text search] | ||
* Calhoun, John C. ''Papers of John C. Calhoun'' (28 volumes, 1959-2003) edited by Clyde N. Wilson et al. | * Calhoun, John C. ''Papers of John C. Calhoun'' (28 volumes, 1959-2003) edited by Clyde N. Wilson et al. | ||
* Wilson, Clyde N. ed. ''The Essential Calhoun'' (1992). | |||
==External links== | ==External links== |
Revision as of 01:27, 6 June 2008
John Caldwell Calhoun (March 18, 1782 – March 31, 1850) was an American politician. He served as a powerful member of Congress and senator from South Carolina from 1832 to 1843, and from 1845 to 1850. He also served as Vice President of United States from 1825 to 1832 under President John Quincy Adams and Andrew Jackson, and as an influential Secretary of War, 1817-25. He considered runs for the presidency. Starting as a leading nationalist and modernizer, after 1828 Calhoun reversed directions and became the foremost spokesman for states rights and slavery. Calhoun was a powerful intellectual leader of the South who aggressively supported slavery, Calhoun expanded the notion of republicanism to include the need to protect minority rights against majority rule; his approach was the "concurrent majority." Increasing distrustful of democracy, he minimized the role of the Second Party System in South Carolina. The leaders of the secession movement in the decade after his death looked to Calhoun as a hero.
Early life
War Hawk
Secretary of War: 1817-25
Calhoun continued his role as a leading nationalist during the "Era of Good Feeling" during the Monroe administration, 1817-25. After the war ended in 1815 the "Old Republicans" in Congress, with their Jeffersonian ideology for economy in the federal government, sought at every turn to reduce the operations and finances of the war department. In 1817, the deplorable state of the war department led four men to turn down requests to fill the secretary of war position before Calhoun finally accepted the task. Political rivalry, namely, Calhoun's political ambitions as well as those of William H. Crawford, the secretary of the treasury, over the pursuit of the 1824 presidency also complicated Calhoun's tenure as war secretary.
As secretary, Calhoun's had responsibility for management of Indian affairs. A reform-minded modernizer, he attempted to institute centralization and efficiency in the Indian department, but Congress either failed to respond to his reforms or responded with hostility. Calhoun's frustration with congressional inaction, political rivalries, and ideological differences that dominated the late early republic spurred him to unilaterally create the Bureau of Indian Affairs in 1824.[1]
Nullification
Calhoun was most famous for his advocacy of nullification, which allows individual states to cancel a federal law it considers unconstitutional. He was the secret author of South Carolina Exposition and Protest, a document that advocated the nullification of the Tariff of 1828. The document was submitted to the South Carolina legislature as a resolution, but it was not passed.
In 1832, the South Carolina legislature passed a resolution that declared the federal tariff of 1828 void. President Andrew Jackson was incensed and the Congress passed the Force Bill, threatening military intervention. The incident was known as the Nullification Crisis. In 1833, Henry Clay helped Jackson and South Carolina to reach a compromise, ending the possibility of an armed invasion of South Carolina.
Most historians argue that nullification (and, in 1860) secession) were reactionary efforts to turn back the abolitionist assault on slavery. Wood (2003) rejects the assumption that Calhoun and his followers were un-American because they resorted to nullification. Woods argues that the longstanding conservative Southern interpretation of republican ideology and its persistence in the South and says the "Nullifiers" viewed their attempts at nullification and secession as well within the framers' views of republicanism. The Constitution produced by the federal convention of 1787 and the structure of the new government that was formed after the Bill of Rights in 1791 further illuminate the significance of the connection between states' rights, nullification, and republicanism.[2]
Slavery
On February 6, 1837, John C. Calhoun took the floor of the Senate to declare that slavery was a "positive good." Senator William Rives of Virginia had referred to slavery as an evil that might become a "lesser evil" in some circumstances. Calhoun believed that conceded too much to the abolitionists: "I take higher ground. I hold that in the present state of civilization, where two races of different origin, and distinguished by color, and other physical differences, as well as intellectual, are brought together, the relation now existing in the slaveholding States between the two, is, instead of an evil, a good—a positive good. . . . I hold then, that there never has yet existed a wealthy and civilized society in which one portion of the community did not, in point of fact, live on the labor of the other." A year later in the Senate (January 10, 1838), Calhoun repeated this defense of slavery as a "positive good": "Many in the South once believed that it was a moral and political evil; that folly and delusion are gone; we see it now in its true light, and regard it as the most safe and stable basis for free institutions in the world." Calhoun rejected the belief of Southern moderates such as Henry Clay that all Americans could agree on the "opinion and feeling" that slavery was wrong, although they might disagree on the most practicable way to respond to that great wrong.
Political philosophy
Agrarian republicanism
Cheek (2001) distinguishes between two strands of American republican thought—the puritan tradition, based in New England, and the agrarian or South Atlantic tradition. Cheek argues that Calhoun is best understood as a representative of the South Atlantic tradition of agrarian republicanism. While the New England tradition stressed a politically centralized enforcement of moral and religious norms to secure civic virtue, the South Atlantic tradition relied on a decentralized moral and religious order based on the idea of subsidiarity (or localism). Cheek locates the fundamental principles of Calhoun's republicanism in the "Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions" (1798) written by Thomas Jefferson and James Madison. Calhoun emphasizes the primacy of the idea of subsidiarity: popular rule is best expressed in local communities that are nearly autonomous while serving as units of a larger society.
Concurrent majority
Calhoun's basic concern for protecting the diverse interests of local communities is expressed in his chief contribution to political science—the idea of a concurrent majority as distinguished from a numerical majority. According to the principle of a numerical majority, the will of the more numerous citizens should always rule, regardless of the burdens on the minority. Such a principle tends toward a consolidation of power in which the interests of the absolute majority always prevail over those of the minority. Calhoun believed that the great achievement of the American constitution was in checking the tyranny of a numerical majority through institutional procedures that required a concurrent majority, such that each important interest in the community must consent to the actions of government. To secure a concurrent majority, those interests that have a numerical majority must compromise with the interests that are in the minority. A concurrent majority requires a unanimous consent of all the major interests in a community, which is the only sure way of preventing majority tyranny. This idea supported Calhoun's doctrine of interposition or nullification, in which the state governments could refuse to enforce or comply with a policy of the Federal government that threatened the vital interests of the states.
Disquisition on Government
The Disquisition on Government was a book that incorporated Calhoun's reasoned views on government as seen from the point of view of the permanent minority (the South). Begun in 1843, and virtually finished in 1848, it elaborates the doctrine of his South Carolina Exposition and Protest. Its keynote is the idea of a concurrent majority. Simple majority government always results in despotism over the minority unless some way is devised to secure the assent of all classes, sections, and interests. The argument is close-knit and convincing if one accepts the belief of Calhoun that the states retain absolute sovereignty over the Constitution and can do with it as they wish. This doctrine could be made effective by nullification. But Calhoun believed that the clear recognition of rights on the part of the states on the one hand and of the national majority on the other would prevent matters ever coming to a crisis. South Carolina and other southern states, in the three decades preceding the Civil War, had provided legislatures in which the vested interests of land and slaves dominated in the upper houses, while the popular will of the numerical majority prevailed in the lower houses. This was done in conscious acceptance of the doctrine of the Disquisition. The Disquisition was published shortly after his death as was his other book, Discourse on the Constitution and Government of the United States.
Bibliography
- Bartlett, Irving H. John C. Calhoun: A Biography (1994), 413pp
- Brown, Guy Story. Calhoun's Philosophy of Politics: A Study of A Disquisition on Government (2000) 435 pp. excerpt and text search
- Capers, Gerald M. John C. Calhoun, Opportunist: A Reappraisal (1960) online edition
- Cheek, H. Lee, Jr. Calhoun and Popular Rule: The Political Theory of the Disquisition and Discourse. (2001). 202 pp. online edition
- Coit, Margaret, L John C. Calhoun: American Portrait 620pp; prize winning popular historyexcerpt and text search
- Ford, Lacy K. Jr. "Inventing the Concurrent Majority: Madison, Calhoun, and the Problem of Majoritarianism in American Political Thought," Journal of Southern History 60 (1994): 19-58 in JSTOR
- Ford, Lacy K. Jr. "Republican Ideology in a Slave Society: The Political Economy of John C. Calhoun," Journal of Southern History 54 (1988): 405-24; in JSTOR
- Freehling, William W. "Spoilsmen and Interests in the Thought and Career of John C. Calhoun," Journal of American History 52 (1965): 25-42. in JSTOR
- Freehling, William W. The Road to Disunion: Secessionists at Bay, 1776-1854 - Vol. 1 (1991), scholarly study online edition
- Niven, John. John C. Calhoun and the Price of Union: A Biography (1993) excerpt and text search
- Peterson
- Vajda, Zoltan. "John C. Calhoun's Republicanism Revisited," Rhetoric & Public Affairs, 4#3 Fall 2001, pp. 433-457 in Project Muse
- Wiltse, Charles M. John C. Calhoun, 3 vols. (1944-1951), the standard scholarly biography
Primary sources
- Calhoun, John Caldwell. A Disquisition on Government edited by Richard Kenner Crallé (1851) 406 pp. online edition
- Calhoun, John C. John C. Calhoun: Selected Writings and Speeches edited by H. Lee Cheek, (2003) excerpt and text search
- Calhoun, John C. Papers of John C. Calhoun (28 volumes, 1959-2003) edited by Clyde N. Wilson et al.
- Wilson, Clyde N. ed. The Essential Calhoun (1992).
External links
notes
- ↑ William S. Belko, "John C. Calhoun and the Creation of the Bureau of Indian Affairs: an Essay on Political Rivalry, Ideology, and Policymaking in the Early Republic." South Carolina Historical Magazine 2004 105(3): 170-197. Issn: 0038-3082
- ↑ W. Kirk Wood, "In Defense of the Republic: John C. Calhoun and State Interposition in South Carolina, 1776-1833." Southern Studies 2003 10(1-2): 9-48. Issn: 0735-8342