Talk:Herodotus: Difference between revisions
imported>Larry Sanger No edit summary |
imported>Larry Sanger m (→Cleanup) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
This page needs some definite cleanup in the way of removing unnecessary "Template:" tags. I'll try to get around to that in the next day or so. In addition, can we squash the "earlier version" note at the end of this article? While I appreciate James Allan Evans' contributions, having a note like that, especially with characters that refuse to render except as ?s, seems rather unprofessional to me. Unless someone thinks we should keep it, I'll probably remove that note in the next couple days, as well. -[[User:Jonas Wisser|Jonas Wisser]] 02:03, 10 February 2007 (CST) | This page needs some definite cleanup in the way of removing unnecessary "Template:" tags. I'll try to get around to that in the next day or so. In addition, can we squash the "earlier version" note at the end of this article? While I appreciate James Allan Evans' contributions, having a note like that, especially with characters that refuse to render except as ?s, seems rather unprofessional to me. Unless someone thinks we should keep it, I'll probably remove that note in the next couple days, as well. -[[User:Jonas Wisser|Jonas Wisser]] 02:03, 10 February 2007 (CST) | ||
Please don't | Please don't; we should credit the original source of the article. I don't know what you are referring to with regard to the ?s. --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 17:38, 24 February 2007 (CST) | ||
==="Top" Categories=== | ==="Top" Categories=== | ||
Revision as of 17:39, 24 February 2007
Cleanup
This page needs some definite cleanup in the way of removing unnecessary "Template:" tags. I'll try to get around to that in the next day or so. In addition, can we squash the "earlier version" note at the end of this article? While I appreciate James Allan Evans' contributions, having a note like that, especially with characters that refuse to render except as ?s, seems rather unprofessional to me. Unless someone thinks we should keep it, I'll probably remove that note in the next couple days, as well. -Jonas Wisser 02:03, 10 February 2007 (CST)
Please don't; we should credit the original source of the article. I don't know what you are referring to with regard to the ?s. --Larry Sanger 17:38, 24 February 2007 (CST)
"Top" Categories
What are these, and why remove a non-top category in favor of its "top" sibling? -jwisser 17:34, 24 February 2007 (CST)
You can ignore them for now. I think we're going to scrap them--I haven't heard any objections to the suggestion that we do so (on the Forums). Just use the non-top category. --Larry Sanger 17:37, 24 February 2007 (CST)