User talk:James F. Perry: Difference between revisions
imported>Nancy Sculerati MD |
imported>Robert Tito m (question) |
||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
Could you kindly correct my mistake and put whatever language ''should'' be there about the pictures on the image bank- thanks, Nancy [[User:Nancy Sculerati MD|Nancy Sculerati MD]] 17:20, 30 January 2007 (CST) | Could you kindly correct my mistake and put whatever language ''should'' be there about the pictures on the image bank- thanks, Nancy [[User:Nancy Sculerati MD|Nancy Sculerati MD]] 17:20, 30 January 2007 (CST) | ||
== question == | |||
hello, just wondering here: why isnt the IAA mentioned in the organisations, or the ESA/NASA and all other international organisations - who are contributing to astronomical research. For popularity you might even consider adding a hubble and webb section about observations of the universe. I do think your section is going ahead very very well, thanks for your contributions and enthusiasm. [[User:Robert Tito|Robert Tito]] 12:45, 31 January 2007 (CST) | |||
Revision as of 12:45, 31 January 2007
Hi, James F. Perry -- I'm just posting a note here to see why you feel that Joan of Arc's visions ought to be removed from the main article. I'm puzzled by the change, but open to hearing why you thought it a good idea. Regards,
Russell Potter 20:09, 7 January 2007 (CST)
Not a problem. Glad to help out. Best,--Jason Sanford 08:35, 8 January 2007 (CST)
Joan of Arc
Hi James, thanks for your notes on my talk page.
The things you're doing make sense to me on one level -- you are adding and expanding content on some very important issues relating to Joan of Arc. My only question is why remove them from the main biographical entry? I could imagine a long article on, say, medieval women mystics, with a subsection on Visions which might include some of the things you've been working on, and cross-referencing this to the main entry. But if you take the section on Visions out of the main entry altogether, you render the main entry far less valuable, I fear. Some summary, or shortened version, should remain in any case; if there is to be a separate article on Joan's visions, it should be clearly cross-referenced with the main entry.
Perhaps this question should be talked about in either the History or Religion discussion forums? It might well be a very good article to breathe some life into those forums with!
cheers,
Russell Potter 13:11, 9 January 2007 (CST)
Copyright/Free Use for Pictures
Could you kindly correct my mistake and put whatever language should be there about the pictures on the image bank- thanks, Nancy Nancy Sculerati MD 17:20, 30 January 2007 (CST)
question
hello, just wondering here: why isnt the IAA mentioned in the organisations, or the ESA/NASA and all other international organisations - who are contributing to astronomical research. For popularity you might even consider adding a hubble and webb section about observations of the universe. I do think your section is going ahead very very well, thanks for your contributions and enthusiasm. Robert Tito 12:45, 31 January 2007 (CST)