CZ Talk:Cold Storage/Knowledge creation: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Larry Sanger
(Deleted)
imported>Derek Harkness
(Article Checklist)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{checklist
|                abc = Knowledge creation
|                cat1 = Library and Information Science
|                cat2 =
|                cat3 =
|          cat_check = n
|              status = 2
|        underlinked = y
|            cleanup = y
|                  by = [[User:Derek Harkness|Derek Harkness]] 11:08, 23 May 2007 (CDT)
}}
This article needs to provide a great deal of context.  Who came up with the notion of "knowledge creation" as described here?  Who talks about or researches it?  Probably, it belongs under a title such as "knowledge creation (knowledge management)" or "knowledge creation (business)".
This article needs to provide a great deal of context.  Who came up with the notion of "knowledge creation" as described here?  Who talks about or researches it?  Probably, it belongs under a title such as "knowledge creation (knowledge management)" or "knowledge creation (business)".



Revision as of 10:08, 23 May 2007


Article Checklist for "CZ Talk:Cold Storage/Knowledge creation"
Workgroup category or categories Library and Information Science Workgroup [Categories OK]
Article status Developing article: beyond a stub, but incomplete
Underlinked article? Yes
Basic cleanup done? Yes
Checklist last edited by Derek Harkness 11:08, 23 May 2007 (CDT)

To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.





This article needs to provide a great deal of context. Who came up with the notion of "knowledge creation" as described here? Who talks about or researches it? Probably, it belongs under a title such as "knowledge creation (knowledge management)" or "knowledge creation (business)".

--Larry Sanger 20:40, 6 November 2006 (CST) (an epistemologist who doesn't know anything about "knowledge creation" as here described)

I again need to express considerable skepticism (forgive the pun) about the content of this article. I'm strongly inclined simply to delete it, on grounds that it is a collection of opinions unattributed to anyone. And again, as an epistemologist, I don't recognize any of this. --Larry Sanger 23:28, 26 January 2007 (CST)

Deleted template that was not filled out. --Larry Sanger 15:46, 21 March 2007 (CDT)