User:DavidGoodman: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>D. Matt Innis
(Thanks for your service!)
imported>D. Matt Innis
(thank you forever!)
Line 64: Line 64:


[[/comments]],..[[/text for pages]],..[[/pages in progress]],.. [[/sandbox]]
[[/comments]],..[[/text for pages]],..[[/pages in progress]],.. [[/sandbox]]
[[Category:CZ Editorial Council Emeritus Members]]

Revision as of 20:04, 25 October 2010

I'm David Goodman (member of the Citizendium Editorial Council)

  • user name: DavidGoodman; email: dgoodmanny@gmail.com; WP name: DGG
    • currently working in CZ on: open access, journals, and related topics

I apologize for my recent absence, but I'm back, & just now starting to edit again

CV (abridged)

  • B.S. Brooklyn College, (math)
  • Ph.D Berkeley, (Molecular biology--Gunther Stent's lab)
  • Post-Doc, Berkeley, (Evolutionary biochemistry--Allen Wilson's lab)
  • Assistant Prof. of Biochemistry, Rutgers-Newark
  • MLS Rutgers
  • Chemistry Librarian, Princeton
  • Biology Librarian, Princeton
  • Biological Sciences Bibliographer & Research Librarian, Princeton
  • Assoc. Prof. of Library Science, Long isand Univ.
  • very temporarily retired.

Current projects:

  • ProjectCOUNTER: Counting Online Usage of Networked Electronic Resources.
  • Open access (analysis & advocacy)
  • Online resources (reviewer and consultant)
  • Scientific publishing (navigating between publishers & libraries)

Interests in CZ:

  • Writing Library-related and publishing-related pages
  • Writing some of the general biology pages
  • Checking the biology for the parts I know enough
  • Possibly working on some of the sexuality-related pages
  • Reference sources for anything (writing or editing)
  • Getting the Public Domain articles in science sourced & upgraded
    • I expect to do more revising than original writing.

Working style:

  • I prefer to work incrementally, in hour-size chunks.
  • I'll work with anyone who's willing to work with me
  • I like to consult on major changes, and to negotiate off-line

CZ possible minority positions:

  • Sensitive topics can (& must) be written about, & I'm willing to try--"family friendly" (an unfortunate terms as it is generally a code word for censorship according to the dictates of U.S. religious fundamentalists and extreme right wing politicians), should here mean anything that someone in a family might want to know.
  • Distrust of academic specialists who think too much of their credentials
  • Joint effort is usually better than the work of a single author.
  • Almost all math & science articles can & should be written so those without a degree in the subject can understand some of it--and the same for any seemingly esoteric subject.

WP minority positions:

  • Using Public Domain sources without exact quotations is plagiarism.
  • Point of view forks are the clearest way of handling some topics.
  • Web sources, even blogs, can be used as Reliable sources for determining notability. The world has changed since WP started.

(Relatively) absolutist position in any context:

  • Freedom of speech.


Biases (not usually obvious here, I hope):

  • Marxist, Atheist, Jewish, Academic, Internationalist


/comments,../text for pages,../pages in progress,.. /sandbox