Natrium reactor: Difference between revisions
imported>David MacQuigg (→Safety: add critiques from Scientific American article) |
imported>David MacQuigg (add note on uranium efficiency) |
||
| Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
== Weapons Proliferation == | == Weapons Proliferation == | ||
Add text here. | Add text here. | ||
Natrium would likely be less uranium efficient and would not reduce the amount of waste that requires long-term isolation.<ref>Elliot Negin (UCS), Commentary on Science in the News, Scientific American, Nov 2021, p.10.</ref> | |||
== Cost == | == Cost == | ||
Revision as of 12:49, 4 December 2021
- See also: Nuclear_power_reconsidered
A Natrium reactor is a fast reactor using molten sodium as the coolant. Development funded by Bill Gates. Like the MCSFR, capable of burning spent nuclear fuel. [1]
This is a suggested outline for an article on a specific reactor design.
It should address the issues raised in the parent article Nuclear power reconsidered
Brief description of the key features of this reactor.[3]
Safety
Accidental overheating. Add text here.
Sodium coolant can burn when exposed to air or water, and the Natrium reactor could experience uncontrollable power surges that result in core melting.[4]
Leakage of Radioactivity Add text here.
Sabotage Add text here.
Waste Management
Add text here.
Weapons Proliferation
Add text here.
Natrium would likely be less uranium efficient and would not reduce the amount of waste that requires long-term isolation.[5]
Cost
Plant cost per KW:
Operating cost per MWh:
Notes and References
- ↑ https://natriumpower.com
- ↑ This is a footnote to an image caption.
- ↑ This is a footnote with a LINK to an external reference.
- ↑ Elliot Negin (UCS), Commentary on Science in the News, Scientific American, Nov 2021, p.10.
- ↑ Elliot Negin (UCS), Commentary on Science in the News, Scientific American, Nov 2021, p.10.