Talk:Schröder-Bernstein theorem/Draft: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Peter Schmitt (done) |
imported>Boris Tsirelson (four remarks) |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
"Details": "the induced induced image"? [[User:Boris Tsirelson|Boris Tsirelson]] 06:29, 26 September 2010 (UTC) | "Details": "the induced induced image"? [[User:Boris Tsirelson|Boris Tsirelson]] 06:29, 26 September 2010 (UTC) | ||
: Thanks. Corrected. --[[User:Peter Schmitt|Peter Schmitt]] 12:26, 28 September 2010 (UTC) | : Thanks. Corrected. --[[User:Peter Schmitt|Peter Schmitt]] 12:26, 28 September 2010 (UTC) | ||
"Proof:Proof": | |||
: <math> S_1 \subset S \subset A | |||
\Rightarrow f_\ast (S_1) \subset f_\ast (S) | |||
</math> | |||
probably should be | |||
: <math> S_1 \subset S \subset A | |||
\Rightarrow \sigma_\ast (S_1) \subset \sigma_\ast (S) | |||
</math> | |||
"Monotone" in general may be understood as "either increasing or decreasing"; it is meant "(momotonely) increasing" or "isotone". | |||
"Proof:Proof": | |||
: "By assumption, there are injective functions (...) that induce..." | |||
I'd say | |||
: "By assumption, there are injective functions (...); they induce..." | |||
because the second part of the phrase is not a part of the assumption (but its consequence). | |||
"Outline": the reader can guess what is denoted by ''f'' and ''g'' (or see the details), but we'd better let him know. | |||
[[User:Boris Tsirelson|Boris Tsirelson]] 12:19, 5 October 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 06:19, 5 October 2010
"Details": "the induced induced image"? Boris Tsirelson 06:29, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks. Corrected. --Peter Schmitt 12:26, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
"Proof:Proof":
probably should be
"Monotone" in general may be understood as "either increasing or decreasing"; it is meant "(momotonely) increasing" or "isotone".
"Proof:Proof":
- "By assumption, there are injective functions (...) that induce..."
I'd say
- "By assumption, there are injective functions (...); they induce..."
because the second part of the phrase is not a part of the assumption (but its consequence).
"Outline": the reader can guess what is denoted by f and g (or see the details), but we'd better let him know.
Boris Tsirelson 12:19, 5 October 2010 (UTC)