Template:CharterVote2/3/Discussion: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>D. Matt Innis
No edit summary
imported>Joe Quick
No edit summary
Line 11: Line 11:
::**Exceptions may be made only in very limited circumstances and only when legally required.
::**Exceptions may be made only in very limited circumstances and only when legally required.
::[[User:D. Matt Innis|D. Matt Innis]] 00:41, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
::[[User:D. Matt Innis|D. Matt Innis]] 00:41, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
:::Yep, that's better. Agree to Matt's version. -[[User:Joe Quick|Joe Quick]] 00:57, 17 July 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 18:57, 16 July 2010

< RETURN TO THE MAIN PAGE

Nobody seems to think this is necessary. I would be willing to change my vote to reject and get rid of it unless some rewording was presented. D. Matt Innis 19:31, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

See my comment on Article 2. This article should make a statement protecting Citizens' rights, but it doesn't. Not really. I suggest this, a slight modification of Jones' statement regarding Article 2:
  • No citizen's use of the site shall be blocked or terminated on the basis of nationality, race, religion, creed, gender, profession, education, residence, or age.
    • Exceptions may be made only in very limited circumstances when required under local law.
How's that? -Joe Quick 00:34, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
  • No citizen's use of the site shall be blocked or terminated on the basis of nationality, race, religion, creed, gender, profession, education, residence, or age.
    • Exceptions may be made only in very limited circumstances and only when legally required.
D. Matt Innis 00:41, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
Yep, that's better. Agree to Matt's version. -Joe Quick 00:57, 17 July 2010 (UTC)