Instrumentation for radioactivity

Instrumentation for radioactivity is of many types, due to different applications (e.g., analysis vs. safety), needs for portability, and the intensity and types of expected radiation. Instruments need to measure:

• Alpha particles
• beta particles
• neutrons
• X-rays
• Gamma rays

Different types are needed, variously, for:

• Health risk to individuals
• Analysis of nuclear materials that emit alpha particles
• Tritium survey

Detector technology

Instruments operate by one of two general principles: ionization or excitation.

Portable detectors share the problems that they may become contaminated and artificially raise the exposure reading. Small units can be easily lost.

Ionization

According to the Federal Emergency Management Agency, there are three portable types, each with advantages and disadgantages.

Portable ionization chamber

One of these instruments is a small, air-filled container in which a quartz fiber is suspended, with a microscope that allows the shadow of the fiber to be read against a graduated scale. When the instrument is initialized, the fiber is charged to 200 volts, causing it to read a cumulative radiation exposure of zero. As the device is struck by ionizing radiation, the ions created in the air cause the fiber to discharge.

Some are direct, or self-reading, while others are indirect, or nonself-reading. There is also a variety of pocket ionization chambers that read at different rates (0.01-200 mR and 1-500 R). Pocket ionization chambers, primarily measure whole body gamma exposure (with some x-radiation).

Advantages With direct-reading instruments, cumulative exposure can be read at any time or location without ancillary equipment, by the user The chambers are reusable by simple electrical recharging Long shelf-life with little to no maintenance requirements; sealed at the time of manufacture and are relatively insensitive to storage conditions. Measure gamma exposure accurately.

Disadvantages "The exposure readings on the devices may be sensitive to a significant mechanical shock (for example, if dropped more than a few feet to a concrete surface). The initial cost of a pocket dosimeter is high," although it is reusable They do not measure neutron, beta, alpha or some X-ray accumulation

Film badges

Film dosimeters, or film badges, do not provide direct response, but are inexpensive and widely used for safety monitoring of personnel routinely exposed to radiation. The badge consists of several layers:

• Front, with identification information and a window for exposure
• Selective filters to screen out radiation not of interest
• One or more radiosensitive films, which will be developed in photographic chemicals
• Possible filters to prevent backscatter into the film
• Mechanical closure and attachment to clothing

After a timed period of exposure, the film is extracted and developed; the density of the developed film is proportional to the intensity of the radiation received. Some film-filter combinations may have different sensitivities in different parts of the film.

Advantages Film badges can record wide ranges of exposure over time: between 10 mrem to 1500 mrem for gamma and x-radiation, and 50 mrem to 1000 rem for beta radiation. They can differentiate between different types of radiation by energy level They are small, lightweight and inexpensive, although there is a continuing cost for film and developing

Disadvantages The response of the film to radiation is energy dependent; at energies less than 300 keV, the response tends to increase. The films cannot be read immediately. Environmental conditions such as heat and humidity will affect the film’s response to radiation. Film badges may be left or lost at the site of the radiation accident

Thermoluminescent dosimeters

Thermoluminescent dosimeter (TLD) badges, like film dosimeters, are issued to radiation workers and emergency responders who have the potential to be exposed to ionizing radiation. Thermoluminescent crystals inside the device are analogous to the film in film badges, except that radiation exposures cause them to glow, and the emitted light can be measured and exposure calculated from its intensity. TLDs are especially good for measuring low-level radiation exposure, in the 1-105 rem range.

Advantages TLDs can be used with radiation fields of widely varying energy and intensity. They can store information for long periods of time without fading. TLDs are reusable, and can be used for many applications because of their small size. TLDs are less energy dependent than film dosimeters or pocket ion chambers.

Disadvantages They cannot be analyzed immediately. Environmental factors such as humidity and heat may affect the results.

Excitation

The basic field survey instrument that can detect alpha particles is an scintillometer, such as the AN/PDR-77, which comes with a set of probes variously intended for alpha, beta/gamma, and low-energy X-ray radiation. The X-ray probe allows detection of plutonium and americium contamination. "Knowing the original assay and the age of the weapon, the ratio of plutonium to americium may be computed accurately and so the total plutonium contamination may be determined.

Field applications

Health

Yet another set of instruments are used to measure health risks to individuals. These include portable ionization chambers, film badges, and thermoluminescent personal dosimeters.

Tritium survey

Different instruments, such as the AN/PDR-73 or AN/PDR-74, are used for tritium survey.

Analysis

There are limits to what can be determined with portable equipment. For more complex analysis, either a transportable laboratory needs to be brought to the site, or, if safety permits, to have representative samples taken to a laboratory. Analysis of radioactive trace elements, for example, can help identify the source of fuel for a given contamination incident. Some of the less portable,, but powerful instrumentation includes gamma spectroscopy, [[low background alpha and beta counting and liquid scintillation counters for extremely low energy beta emitters such as tritium.

The DoD directive makes the distinction clear that detection is harder than measurement, and the latter is necessary for MASINT:

Nuclear radiation is not easy to detect. Radiation detection is always a multistep, highly indirect process. For example, in a scintillation detector, incident radiation excites a fluorescent material that de-excites by emitting photons of light. ... the quantitative relationship between the amount of radiation actually emitted and the reading on the meter is a complex function of many factors. Since those factors may only be controlled well within a laboratory. Such a laboratory either must be moved to the field, or samples brought to a fixed laboratory.

Detectors based on semiconductors, such as germanium, have better intrinsic energy resolution than scintillators, and are preferred where feasible for gamma-ray spectrometry. Neutron detection is improved by using hydrogen-rich scintillation counters, such those using a liquid rather than a crystal scintillation source.