Talk:Active attack/Draft: Difference between revisions
imported>Anthony.Sebastian (→Comments: Notes re progress of approval process) |
imported>Anthony.Sebastian |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
== Approval Process: {{ApprovalProcess| | == Approval Process: {{ApprovalProcess|review}} == | ||
''Call for review: ''[[User:Anthony.Sebastian|Anthony.Sebastian]] 20:23, 22 April 2012 (UTC) | ''Call for review: ''[[User:Anthony.Sebastian|Anthony.Sebastian]] 20:23, 22 April 2012 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 20:24, 11 May 2012
Perhaps more of an aside from electronic warfare...
Rather than active vs. passive in electronic attack, the terminology nonkinetic vs. kinetic is used. Nonkinetic uses all the elegant electronic and computer methods, while kinetic is truly brute force. Many years ago, I was at an Armed Forces Communications Electronics Association meeting after the 1973 Middle East war. Someone asked an Israeli general how he preferred to counter a particular Soviet radar, expecting some involved imitative jamming technique. He said he really preferred a 500 pound bomb straight down the antenna. Howard C. Berkowitz 06:27, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
Call for review re approval
Approval Process: Review period
Call for review: Anthony.Sebastian 20:23, 22 April 2012 (UTC)
Call for Approval: —Anthony.Sebastian 22:32, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
Approval Notice:
Certification of Approval:
Please discuss the article below, Active attack/Approval is for brief official referee's only!
Comments
++++
- Announced call for approval.
- Submitted requests for comments/suggestions to mailing lists: Mathematics; Computers.
- Submitted request on forum: "Please review "Active attack" for consideration of approval. —Anthony.Sebastian 20:50, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
++++