Talk:John Byron: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>George Swan (first draft) |
imported>George Swan (→question...: new section) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{subpages}} | {{subpages}} | ||
== question... == | |||
A recent change, with many excellent new facts, states Byron was "promoted to Commodore". | |||
Excuse me, but, prior to the late 19th and 20th Century, was it correct to say someone could be promoted to Commodore? In the Royal Navy didn't Post Captains who received an appointment to command several vessels retain their seniority on the Captains' list? And when the expedition was over: | |||
* didn't they stopped being called Commodore? | |||
* didn't their pay return to their Captain's pay? | |||
* didn't they return to wearing a Captain's uniform? | |||
* didn't Captains with a higher seniority on the Captains' list continue to out-rank them -- even if they had never received a Commodore's appointment? | |||
I suggest if I am remembering this correctly it is incorrect to state he was promoted to Commodore. | |||
Cheers! [[User:George Swan|George Swan]] 10:49, 14 August 2008 (CDT) |
Revision as of 09:49, 14 August 2008
question...
A recent change, with many excellent new facts, states Byron was "promoted to Commodore".
Excuse me, but, prior to the late 19th and 20th Century, was it correct to say someone could be promoted to Commodore? In the Royal Navy didn't Post Captains who received an appointment to command several vessels retain their seniority on the Captains' list? And when the expedition was over:
- didn't they stopped being called Commodore?
- didn't their pay return to their Captain's pay?
- didn't they return to wearing a Captain's uniform?
- didn't Captains with a higher seniority on the Captains' list continue to out-rank them -- even if they had never received a Commodore's appointment?
I suggest if I am remembering this correctly it is incorrect to state he was promoted to Commodore.
Cheers! George Swan 10:49, 14 August 2008 (CDT)