Talk:History of music psychology: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Ulrich Terstiege No edit summary |
imported>Ulrich Terstiege No edit summary |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
My plan is to divide the talk into two parts. | My plan is to divide the talk into two parts. | ||
Part I gives an overview of the history of systematic musicology following §2,3 and 4 of the paper of Leman and Schneider including a description of the notion of Gestalt psychology and the development of its role in musicology. I also want to give a brief summary of, resp. to mention | Part I gives an overview of the history of systematic musicology following §2,3 and 4 of the paper of Leman and Schneider including a description of the notion of Gestalt psychology and the development of its role in musicology. I also want to give a brief summary of, resp. to mention | ||
# the work of von Helmholtz, | |||
# Darwin's view of the function of music and Spencer's different opinion, | |||
# the cognitive model of perception of music given by Knoblauch given in 1888. | |||
Part II describes the results of the two papers by Sachs. Here I wonder if his results are today still accepted by leading researchers. Does anybody know? | Part II describes the results of the two papers by Sachs. Here I wonder if his results are today still accepted by leading researchers. Does anybody know? |
Revision as of 12:31, 3 August 2008
My plan is to divide the talk into two parts.
Part I gives an overview of the history of systematic musicology following §2,3 and 4 of the paper of Leman and Schneider including a description of the notion of Gestalt psychology and the development of its role in musicology. I also want to give a brief summary of, resp. to mention
- the work of von Helmholtz,
- Darwin's view of the function of music and Spencer's different opinion,
- the cognitive model of perception of music given by Knoblauch given in 1888.
Part II describes the results of the two papers by Sachs. Here I wonder if his results are today still accepted by leading researchers. Does anybody know?
Categories:
- Article with Definition
- Music Category Check
- Psychology Category Check
- History Category Check
- Developing Articles
- Nonstub Articles
- Internal Articles
- Music Developing Articles
- Music Nonstub Articles
- Music Internal Articles
- Psychology Developing Articles
- Psychology Nonstub Articles
- Psychology Internal Articles
- History Developing Articles
- History Nonstub Articles
- History Internal Articles
- Music Underlinked Articles
- Underlinked Articles
- Psychology Underlinked Articles
- History Underlinked Articles
- History tag