Talk:House of Commons (United Kingdom): Difference between revisions
imported>David E. Volk (→Move) |
imported>Nick Gardner (→Overhaul: new section) |
||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
= Article moved == | = Article moved == | ||
I acted boldy and moved it to [[House of Commons (United Kingdom)]]. I will work up the disambig shortly. [[User:David E. Volk|David E. Volk]] 18:54, 8 December 2008 (UTC) | I acted boldy and moved it to [[House of Commons (United Kingdom)]]. I will work up the disambig shortly. [[User:David E. Volk|David E. Volk]] 18:54, 8 December 2008 (UTC) | ||
== Overhaul == | |||
This article would benefit, in my opinion, from a thorough overhaul to improve its clarity, and repair its lack of citations. The present arrangement of the material is such that a piecemeal edit would not serve the purpose. I will await comments before attempting a rewrite.[[User:Nick Gardner|Nick Gardner]] 14:29, 12 February 2012 (UTC) |
Revision as of 08:29, 12 February 2012
Move
I think this is going to have to be renamed because Canada also has a House of Commons. We could call this House of Commons of the United Kingdom (not 'British House of Commons' - the website has UK in it). I see no reason, for the moment, why House of Commons can't redirect here, though. John Stephenson 03:17, 13 June 2008 (CDT)
- Slept on this and though that House of Commons (UK) would be better, as House of Commons of the United Kingdom also looks like a formal name. John Stephenson 21:58, 13 June 2008 (CDT)
Article moved =
I acted boldy and moved it to House of Commons (United Kingdom). I will work up the disambig shortly. David E. Volk 18:54, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
Overhaul
This article would benefit, in my opinion, from a thorough overhaul to improve its clarity, and repair its lack of citations. The present arrangement of the material is such that a piecemeal edit would not serve the purpose. I will await comments before attempting a rewrite.Nick Gardner 14:29, 12 February 2012 (UTC)