Talk:Myanmar: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>David Finn (reply) |
imported>Ro Thorpe mNo edit summary |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:Why is it being called Burma in the article? [[User:David Finn|David Finn]] 10:12, 11 October 2010 (UTC) | :Why is it being called Burma in the article? [[User:David Finn|David Finn]] 10:12, 11 October 2010 (UTC) | ||
Neutrality is not an option. There is a | Neutrality is not an option. There is a redirect from the SLORC's name - and I've corrected ''their'' name... [[User:Ro Thorpe|Ro Thorpe]] 13:56, 11 October 2010 (UTC) | ||
:I don't get it - is Citizendium taking a political stance on the naming of this article? The United Nations [http://www.un.org/en/members/index.shtml members index] lists the country as Myanmar. If that is what the UN call it, what reason does CZ have for an opposite approach - there is nothing in the article itself that elaborates on this point. [[User:David Finn|David Finn]] 14:08, 11 October 2010 (UTC) | :I don't get it - is Citizendium taking a political stance on the naming of this article? The United Nations [http://www.un.org/en/members/index.shtml members index] lists the country as Myanmar. If that is what the UN call it, what reason does CZ have for an opposite approach - there is nothing in the article itself that elaborates on this point. [[User:David Finn|David Finn]] 14:08, 11 October 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 09:18, 11 October 2010
I think we should follow Wikipedia's lead, and use this name (I participated in the discussion there). I saw the junta's name in an article (sorry, forget which) during the Big Write & thought it was time to raise this point. Ro Thorpe 19:19, 5 March 2008 (CST)
- Why is it being called Burma in the article? David Finn 10:12, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
Neutrality is not an option. There is a redirect from the SLORC's name - and I've corrected their name... Ro Thorpe 13:56, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
- I don't get it - is Citizendium taking a political stance on the naming of this article? The United Nations members index lists the country as Myanmar. If that is what the UN call it, what reason does CZ have for an opposite approach - there is nothing in the article itself that elaborates on this point. David Finn 14:08, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
You seem to be saying that the UN should decide CZ policy. As I say, neutrality is not an option. Ro Thorpe 15:11, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
- No, I asked what reason does CZ have for an opposite approach, which is a different question. I don't seem to be getting a straightforward answer here, I'll post the question on the forums and ask for community input. Cheers. David Finn 15:15, 11 October 2010 (UTC)