CZ:Proposals/Driverless: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Larry Sanger
(New page: '''Initial proposal records that lost, or never gained, an active driver will be moved here.''' ''Add driverless proposal record here.'' {{Proposals navigation}})
 
imported>Larry Sanger
(+ history naming convention proposal (no driver!))
Line 1: Line 1:
'''Initial proposal records that lost, or never gained, an active driver will be moved here.'''
'''Initial proposal records that lost, or never gained, an active driver will be moved here.'''


''Add driverless proposal record here.''
== Should history articles be named with general terms first? ==
{{proposal
|Brief descriptive title = Should history articles be named with general terms first?
|Summary of proposal = Should general article names be written as [[France, history]] as preferred to [[History of France]] or [[French History]]?  The central points of contention is whether general articles (e.g [[France, history]]) should be called [[History of France]] or even [[French history]]. The idea is that the keyword should be first in an article such as this, with people searching for [[France]] in a general search will see a list of articles, e.g:
*[[France]]
*[[France, history]]
*[[France, politics]]
*[[France, literature]]
etc.
|Name and date of original proposer = [[User:Denis Cavanagh|Denis Cavanagh]] 11:29, 8 February 2008 (CST)
|Username of driver =
|Next step =
|Target date for next step =
|Notes= This has been discussed before but deserves a fuller debate. I don't really have an opinion on the issue despite the history workgroup handily being my most active one.[[User:Denis Cavanagh|Denis Cavanagh]] 11:29, 8 February 2008 (CST)
}}


{{Proposals navigation}}
{{Proposals navigation}}

Revision as of 11:51, 15 February 2008

Initial proposal records that lost, or never gained, an active driver will be moved here.

Should history articles be named with general terms first?

Summary: Should general article names be written as France, history as preferred to History of France or French History? The central points of contention is whether general articles (e.g France, history) should be called History of France or even French history. The idea is that the keyword should be first in an article such as this, with people searching for France in a general search will see a list of articles, e.g:

etc.

Original proposer: Denis Cavanagh 11:29, 8 February 2008 (CST) Next step: Fill in next step
Driver: Driver needed (i.e., someone familiar with the proposals system who will move it through the system) To be done by: Fill in target date for next step
Notes: This has been discussed before but deserves a fuller debate. I don't really have an opinion on the issue despite the history workgroup handily being my most active one.Denis Cavanagh 11:29, 8 February 2008 (CST)
Complete proposal


Proposals System Navigation (advanced users only)

Proposal lists (some planned pages are still blank):