Pseudoscience/External Links: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Gareth Leng
No edit summary
imported>Gareth Leng
No edit summary
Line 15: Line 15:
*[http://www.ucmp.berkeley.edu/geology/techist.html Plate Tectonics:] The Rocky History of an Idea; on rthe webite of the Museum of Palaeontology, University of California
*[http://www.ucmp.berkeley.edu/geology/techist.html Plate Tectonics:] The Rocky History of an Idea; on rthe webite of the Museum of Palaeontology, University of California
* [http://www.umtec.ch/dokumente/dokumente/downloads/publikationen/Checklist%20for%20identifying%20dubious%20technical%20processes%20and%20products.pdf Checklist for identifying dubious technologies]; Bunge, R, Stoll, J-M, and Bucher, B.
* [http://www.umtec.ch/dokumente/dokumente/downloads/publikationen/Checklist%20for%20identifying%20dubious%20technical%20processes%20and%20products.pdf Checklist for identifying dubious technologies]; Bunge, R, Stoll, J-M, and Bucher, B.
* [http://www.csicop.org/resources/organizations.html International directory of skeptic organisations]

Revision as of 11:54, 29 November 2007

There are many websites set up to air skeptical opinions particularly concerning claims for the effectiveness of remedies or treatments for a wide range of medical conditions which are not endorsed by conventional medicine, and to criticise unconventional "fringe" theories that are not generally accepted. The standard of these sites (and the standards of arguments within them) vary considerably, and it would be a mistake to assume that these always present the fringe theories fairly, or the scientific arguments (for or against) rigorously. Among these sites are: