Talk:Atomic number: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Subpagination Bot m (Add {{subpages}} and remove checklist (details)) |
imported>Larry Sanger No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{subpages}} | {{subpages}} | ||
"A chemical element is uniquely identified by its nuclear charge ''eZ''"--I had two years of chemistry in high school, over 20 years ago, so FWIW, this doesn't make any sense to me. It seems to me that "atomic number" is a very basic sort of topic, in which phrases like "its nuclear charge ''eZ''" should be explained, not assumed. Or am I wrong? --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 23:10, 11 June 2008 (CDT) |
Revision as of 22:10, 11 June 2008
"A chemical element is uniquely identified by its nuclear charge eZ"--I had two years of chemistry in high school, over 20 years ago, so FWIW, this doesn't make any sense to me. It seems to me that "atomic number" is a very basic sort of topic, in which phrases like "its nuclear charge eZ" should be explained, not assumed. Or am I wrong? --Larry Sanger 23:10, 11 June 2008 (CDT)