Talk:Banana: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Joe Quick |
imported>Aleta Curry (→A comment (or two): At least nobody said that I *was* bananas!) |
||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
Also, I find the Hobbies Workgroup categorization a little odd. I suppose it's there because bananas are a potential garden plant. But then isn't just about ''anything'' a potential hobby for ''someone''? Do we need editorial oversight from the Hobbies Workgroup for an article on bananas? —[[User:Eric Winesett|Eric Winesett]] 11:01, 24 November 2007 (CST) | Also, I find the Hobbies Workgroup categorization a little odd. I suppose it's there because bananas are a potential garden plant. But then isn't just about ''anything'' a potential hobby for ''someone''? Do we need editorial oversight from the Hobbies Workgroup for an article on bananas? —[[User:Eric Winesett|Eric Winesett]] 11:01, 24 November 2007 (CST) | ||
:For a)no, I don't think so. It's in a note, and I put it there because it *is* a complex business and *someone* should speak to it, and a note will remind someone to do that...eventually....As to b)well, I started this, and I was thinking of cooking with bananas, and gardening with bananas (I am from Australia, after all. I suppose people don't spend time cooking and gardening with bananas in Philadelphia. Thinking more about it, "Food Science" would probably be better...? | :For a)no, I don't think so. It's in a note, and I put it there because it *is* a complex business and *someone* should speak to it, and a note will remind someone to do that...eventually....As to b)well, I started this, and I was thinking of cooking with bananas, and gardening with bananas (I am from Australia, after all. I suppose people don't spend time cooking and gardening with bananas in Philadelphia.) Thinking more about it, "Food Science" would probably be better...? | ||
[[User:Aleta Curry|Aleta Curry]] 22:59, 24 November 2007 (CST) | :[[User:Aleta Curry|Aleta Curry]] 22:59, 24 November 2007 (CST) | ||
::We can agree to disagree on the first part, but this much I know: Next time I fill out a form that asks about my hobbies, I'm definitely writing "bananas". —[[User:Eric Winesett|Eric Winesett]] 23:47, 24 November 2007 (CST) | ::We can agree to disagree on the first part, but this much I know: Next time I fill out a form that asks about my hobbies, I'm definitely writing "bananas". —[[User:Eric Winesett|Eric Winesett]] 23:47, 24 November 2007 (CST) | ||
:::I'm going to write "sexual dimorphism" [http://en.citizendium.org/wiki?title=Talk:Sexual_dimorphism&diff=100194427]. ;-) --[[User:Joe Quick|Joe Quick]] 00:07, 25 November 2007 (CST) | :::I'm going to write "sexual dimorphism" [http://en.citizendium.org/wiki?title=Talk:Sexual_dimorphism&diff=100194427]. ;-) --[[User:Joe Quick|Joe Quick]] 00:07, 25 November 2007 (CST) | ||
::::Ha! "Name your hobbies" -- Photography, stamp collecting and bananas. Least it would bea talking point! "Sexual dimorphism" was one of my wittier moments. I'll go change the cat; surprised you didn't already. |
Revision as of 14:18, 25 November 2007
A comment (or two)
At this stage, almost every article is going to have broken ("red") links to as-yet unwritten CZ articles, but it seems a bit much to write "The naming of species in the genus Musa, family Musaceae, is a complex business. See more, including the taxonomic history, at Musa," when no such article exists.
Also, I find the Hobbies Workgroup categorization a little odd. I suppose it's there because bananas are a potential garden plant. But then isn't just about anything a potential hobby for someone? Do we need editorial oversight from the Hobbies Workgroup for an article on bananas? —Eric Winesett 11:01, 24 November 2007 (CST)
- For a)no, I don't think so. It's in a note, and I put it there because it *is* a complex business and *someone* should speak to it, and a note will remind someone to do that...eventually....As to b)well, I started this, and I was thinking of cooking with bananas, and gardening with bananas (I am from Australia, after all. I suppose people don't spend time cooking and gardening with bananas in Philadelphia.) Thinking more about it, "Food Science" would probably be better...?
- Aleta Curry 22:59, 24 November 2007 (CST)
- We can agree to disagree on the first part, but this much I know: Next time I fill out a form that asks about my hobbies, I'm definitely writing "bananas". —Eric Winesett 23:47, 24 November 2007 (CST)
- Ha! "Name your hobbies" -- Photography, stamp collecting and bananas. Least it would bea talking point! "Sexual dimorphism" was one of my wittier moments. I'll go change the cat; surprised you didn't already.
Categories:
- Article with Definition
- Developing Articles
- Nonstub Articles
- Internal Articles
- Agriculture Developing Articles
- Agriculture Nonstub Articles
- Agriculture Internal Articles
- Food Science Developing Articles
- Food Science Nonstub Articles
- Food Science Internal Articles
- Biology Developing Articles
- Biology Nonstub Articles
- Biology Internal Articles
- Agriculture Underlinked Articles
- Underlinked Articles
- Food Science Underlinked Articles
- Biology Underlinked Articles
- Botany tag