Deep vein thrombosis: Difference between revisions
imported>Yi Zhe Wu m (→External links: remove broken templates and categories from WP) |
imported>Robert Badgett (→Prophylaxis (Prevention): Added secton for oncology patients based on recent guidelines) |
||
Line 83: | Line 83: | ||
Regarding general medical inpatients the guidelines state, "In acutely ill medical patients who have been admitted to the hospital with congestive heart failure or severe respiratory disease, or who are confined to bed and have one or more additional risk factors, including active cancer, previous VTE, [[sepsis]], acute neurologic disease, or inflammatory bowel disease, we recommend prophylaxis with LDUH (Grade 1A) or LMWH (Grade 1A)<ref name="pmid15383478">.</ref>." Enoxaparin or unfractionated heparin may be used.<ref>{{cite journal|title=Twice vs three times daily heparin dosing for thromboembolism prophylaxis in the general medical population: A metaanalysis|author=King CS, Holley AB, Jackson JL, Shorr AF, Moores LK|journal=Chest|year=2007|volume=131|issue=2|pages=507–16|pmid=17296655}}</ref> LMWH may be more effective than UFH. If UFH heparin is used, 5000 U 3 times daily may be more effective<ref name="pmidpending">Wein L et al. [http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/full/167/14/1476 Pharmacological Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis in Hospitalized Medical Patients]. Arch Intern med 2007;167:1476-1486.</ref> | Regarding general medical inpatients the guidelines state, "In acutely ill medical patients who have been admitted to the hospital with congestive heart failure or severe respiratory disease, or who are confined to bed and have one or more additional risk factors, including active cancer, previous VTE, [[sepsis]], acute neurologic disease, or inflammatory bowel disease, we recommend prophylaxis with LDUH (Grade 1A) or LMWH (Grade 1A)<ref name="pmid15383478">.</ref>." Enoxaparin or unfractionated heparin may be used.<ref>{{cite journal|title=Twice vs three times daily heparin dosing for thromboembolism prophylaxis in the general medical population: A metaanalysis|author=King CS, Holley AB, Jackson JL, Shorr AF, Moores LK|journal=Chest|year=2007|volume=131|issue=2|pages=507–16|pmid=17296655}}</ref> LMWH may be more effective than UFH. If UFH heparin is used, 5000 U 3 times daily may be more effective<ref name="pmidpending">Wein L et al. [http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/full/167/14/1476 Pharmacological Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis in Hospitalized Medical Patients]. Arch Intern med 2007;167:1476-1486.</ref> | ||
Since publication of the ACCP guidelines, an additional [[randomized controlled trial]] <ref name="pmid16431185">Lederle FA, Sacks JM, Fiore L, Landefeld CS, Steinberg N, Peters RW, Eid AA, Sebastian J, Stasek JE Jr, Fye CL. The prophylaxis of medical patients for thromboembolism pilot study. Am J Med. 2006;119:54-9. PMID 16431185</ref> and [[meta-analysis]] <ref name="pmid17310052">Dentali F, Douketis JD, Gianni M, Lim W, Crowther MA. [http://annals.org/cgi/content/full/146/4/278 Meta-analysis: anticoagulant prophylaxis to prevent symptomatic venous thromboembolism in hospitalized medical patients]. Ann Intern Med. 2007;146:278-88. PMID 17310052</ref> including the trial have been published. The [[meta-analysis]] concluded " Anticoagulant prophylaxis is effective in preventing symptomatic venous thromboembolism during anticoagulant prophylaxis in at-risk hospitalized medical patients. Additional research is needed to determine the risk for venous thromboembolism in these patients after prophylaxis has been stopped." With regards to which patients are at risk, most studies in the meta-analysis were of patients with [[New York Heart Association Functional Classification]] (NYHA) III-IV heart failure. Regarding patients at lesser risk of DVT, the trial above<ref name="pmid16431185" | Since publication of the ACCP guidelines, an additional [[randomized controlled trial]] <ref name="pmid16431185">Lederle FA, Sacks JM, Fiore L, Landefeld CS, Steinberg N, Peters RW, Eid AA, Sebastian J, Stasek JE Jr, Fye CL. The prophylaxis of medical patients for thromboembolism pilot study. Am J Med. 2006;119:54-9. PMID 16431185</ref> and [[meta-analysis]] <ref name="pmid17310052">Dentali F, Douketis JD, Gianni M, Lim W, Crowther MA. [http://annals.org/cgi/content/full/146/4/278 Meta-analysis: anticoagulant prophylaxis to prevent symptomatic venous thromboembolism in hospitalized medical patients]. Ann Intern Med. 2007;146:278-88. PMID 17310052</ref> including the trial have been published. The [[meta-analysis]] concluded " Anticoagulant prophylaxis is effective in preventing symptomatic venous thromboembolism during anticoagulant prophylaxis in at-risk hospitalized medical patients. Additional research is needed to determine the risk for venous thromboembolism in these patients after prophylaxis has been stopped." With regards to which patients are at risk, most studies in the meta-analysis were of patients with [[New York Heart Association Functional Classification]] (NYHA) III-IV heart failure. Regarding patients at lesser risk of DVT, the trial above<ref name="pmid16431185"/> and an earlier trial<ref name="pmid8637340">{{cite journal |author=Gärdlund B |title=Randomised, controlled trial of low-dose heparin for prevention of fatal pulmonary embolism in patients with infectious diseases. The Heparin Prophylaxis Study Group |journal=Lancet |volume=347 |issue=9012 |pages=1357–61 |year=1996 |pmid=8637340 |doi= |issn=}}</ref> are relevant yet inconclusive. | ||
===Oncology patients=== | |||
According to a [[clinical practice guideline]] by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, "all hospitalized cancer patients should be considered for VTE prophylaxis with anticoagulants in the absence of bleeding or other contraindications."<ref name="pmid17968019">{{cite journal |author=Lyman GH, Khorana AA, Falanga A, ''et al'' |title=American Society of Clinical Oncology Guideline: Recommendations for Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis and Treatment in Patients With Cancer |journal= |volume= |issue= |pages= |year=2007 |pmid=17968019 |doi=10.1200/JCO.2007.14.1283 |issn=}}</ref> | |||
===Surgery Patients=== | ===Surgery Patients=== |
Revision as of 10:06, 2 November 2007
Deep-vein thrombosis (also known as deep-venous thrombosis or DVT and colloquially as economy class syndrome) is the formation of a blood clot ("thrombus") in a deep vein. It commonly affects the leg veins, such as the femoral vein or the popliteal vein or the deep veins of the pelvis. Occasionally the veins of the arm are affected (known as Paget-Schrötter disease). Thrombophlebitis is the more general class of pathologies of this kind.
Signs and symptoms
There may be no symptoms referrable to the location of the DVT, but the classical symptoms of DVT include pain, swelling and redness of the leg and dilatation of the surface veins. In up to 25% of all hospitalized patients, there may be some form of DVT, which often remains clinically inapparent (unless pulmonary embolism develops).
There are several techniques during physical examination to increase the detection of DVT, such as measuring the circumference of the affected and the contralateral limb at a fixed point (to objectivate edema), and palpating the venous tract, which is often tender. Physical examination is unreliable for excluding the diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis.
A careful history has to be taken considering risk factors (see below), including the use of estrogen-containing methods of hormonal contraception, recent long-haul flying, and a history of miscarriage (which is a feature of several disorders that can also cause thrombosis). A family history can reveal a hereditary factor in the development of DVT.
It is vital that the possibility of pulmonary embolism be included in the history, as this may warrant further investigation (see pulmonary embolism).
Complications As a complication, post-thrombotic syndrome can develop. Post-phlebitic syndrome occurs in 10% of patients with deep vein thrombosis (DVT). It presents with leg oedema, pain, nocturnal cramping, venous claudication, skin pigmentation, dermatitis and ulceration (usually on the medial aspect of the lower leg). In phlegmasia alba dolens, the leg is pale and cool with a diminished arterial pulse due to spasm. It usually results from acute occlusion of the iliac and femoral veins due to DVT. In phlegmasia cerulea dolens, there is an acute and nearly total venous occlusion of the entire extremity outflow, including the iliac and femoral veins. The leg is usually painful, cyanosed and oedematous. Venous gangrene may supervene.
Diagnosis
Homan's sign is used in clinical practice to diagnose DVT.
The gold standard is intravenous venography, which involves injecting a peripheral vein of the affected limb with a contrast agent and taking X-rays, to reveal whether the venous supply has been obstructed. Because of its invasiveness, this test is rarely performed.
Impedance plethysmography and Doppler ultrasonography are non-invasive alternatives.
Probability scoring
In 2006, Scarvelis and Wells overviewed a set of clinical criteria for DVT,[1] on the heels of a widely adopted set of clinical criteria for pulmonary embolism.[2][3]
Wells score or criteria: (Possible score -2 to 9)
- 1) Active cancer (treatment within last 6 months or palliative) -- 1 point
- 2) Calf swelling >3cm compared to other calf (measured 10cm below tibial tuberosity) -- 1 point
- 3) Collateral superficial veins (non-varicose) -- 1 point
- 4) Pitting edema (confined to symptomatic leg) -- 1 point
- 5) Swelling of entire leg - 1 point
- 6) Localized pain along distribution of deep venous system -- 1 point
- 7) Paralysis, paresis, or recent cast immobilization of lower extremities -- 1 point
- 8) Recently bedridden > 3 days, or major surgery requiring regional or general anesthetic in past 12 weeks -- 1 point
- 9) Previously documented DVT -- 1 point
- 10) Alternative diagnosis at least as likely -- Subtract 2 points
Interpretation:
- Score of 2 or higher - deep vein thrombosis is likely. Consider imaging the leg veins.
- Score of less than 2 - deep vein thrombosis is unlikely. Consider blood test such as d-dimer test to further rule out deep vein thrombosis.
Imaging the leg veins
Compression ultrasound scanning of the leg veins, combined with duplex measurements (to determine blood flow), can reveal a blood clot and its extent (i.e. whether it is below or above the knee).
Blood tests
In a low-probability situation, current practice is to commence investigations by testing for D-dimer levels. This cross-linked fibrin degradation product is an indication that thrombosis is occurring, and that the blood clot is being dissolved by plasmin. A low D dimer level should prompt other possible diagnoses (such as a ruptured Baker's cyst, if this has not been considered as part of the history).
Other blood tests usually performed at this point are:
- complete blood count
- Primary coagulation studies: PT, APTT, Fibrinogen
- liver enzymes
- renal function and electrolytes
Therapy
- Thrombolysis is generally reserved for extensive clot, e.g. an iliofemoral thrombosis. Although a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials by the Cochrane Collaboration shows improved outcomes with thrombolysis,[4] there may be an increase in serious bleeding complications.
- Anticoagulation is the usual treatment for DVT. In general, patients are initiated on a brief course (i.e., less than a week) of heparin treatment while they start on a 3- to 6-month course of warfarin (or related vitamin K inhibitors). Low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) is preferred,[5] though unfractionated heparin is given in patients who have a contraindication to LMWH (e.g., renal failure or imminent need for invasive procedure). In patients who have had recurrent DVTs (two or more), anticoagulation is generally "life-long." The Cochrane Collaboration has meta-analyzed the risk and benefits of prolonged anti-coagulation.[6]
- Elastic compression stockings should be routinely applied.[5] The stockings in almost all trials were stronger than routine anti-embolism stockings and created either 20-30 mm Hg or 30-40 mm Hg. Most trials used knee-high stockings. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials by the Cochrane Collaboration showed reduced incidence of post-phlebitic syndrome.[7] The number needed to treat is quite potent at 4 to 5 patients need to prevent one case of post-phlebitic syndrome.[8]
- Inferior vena cava filter reduces pulmonary embolism[9] and is an option for patients with an absolute contraindiciation to anticoagulant treatment (e.g., cerebral hemorrhage) or those rare patients who have objectively documented recurrent PEs while on anticoagulation, an inferior vena cava filter (also referred to as a Greenfield filter) may prevent pulmonary embolisation of the leg clot. However these filters are themselves potential foci of thrombosis,[10] IVC filters are viewed as a temporizing measure for preventing life-threatening pulmonary embolism.
- Hospitalization should be considered in patients with more than two of the following risk factors as these patients may have more risk of complications during treatment[11]:
- bilateral DVT, renal insufficiency, body weight <70 kg, recent immobility, chronic heart failure, and cancer
Prophylaxis (Prevention)
Clinical practice guidelines by the American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP) provide recommendations on DVT prophylaxis in hospitalized patients [12].
General Medical Inpatients
Regarding general medical inpatients the guidelines state, "In acutely ill medical patients who have been admitted to the hospital with congestive heart failure or severe respiratory disease, or who are confined to bed and have one or more additional risk factors, including active cancer, previous VTE, sepsis, acute neurologic disease, or inflammatory bowel disease, we recommend prophylaxis with LDUH (Grade 1A) or LMWH (Grade 1A)[12]." Enoxaparin or unfractionated heparin may be used.[13] LMWH may be more effective than UFH. If UFH heparin is used, 5000 U 3 times daily may be more effective[14]
Since publication of the ACCP guidelines, an additional randomized controlled trial [15] and meta-analysis [16] including the trial have been published. The meta-analysis concluded " Anticoagulant prophylaxis is effective in preventing symptomatic venous thromboembolism during anticoagulant prophylaxis in at-risk hospitalized medical patients. Additional research is needed to determine the risk for venous thromboembolism in these patients after prophylaxis has been stopped." With regards to which patients are at risk, most studies in the meta-analysis were of patients with New York Heart Association Functional Classification (NYHA) III-IV heart failure. Regarding patients at lesser risk of DVT, the trial above[15] and an earlier trial[17] are relevant yet inconclusive.
Oncology patients
According to a clinical practice guideline by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, "all hospitalized cancer patients should be considered for VTE prophylaxis with anticoagulants in the absence of bleeding or other contraindications."[18]
Surgery Patients
In patients who have undergone surgery, low molecular weight heparins (LMWH) are routinely administered to prevent thrombosis. LMWH can only currently be administered subcutaneously by injection. Prophylaxis for pregnant women who have a history of thrombosis may be limited to LMWH injections or may not be necessary if their risk factors are mainly temporary.
Early and regular ambulation (walking) is a treatment that predates anticoagulants and is still recognized and used today. Walking activates the body's muscle pumps, increasing venous velocity and preventing stasis. Intermittent pneumatic compression (IPC) machines have proven protective in bed- or chair-ridden patients at very high risk or with contraindications to heparins. IPC machines use air bladders that are wrapped around the thigh and/or calf. The bladders alternately inflate and deflate, squeezing the muscles and increasing blood velocity by as much as 500%. IPC machines have been proven effective on knee and hip surgery patients (a population with a risk as high as 80% with no prophylactic treatment) of developing DVT and PE. Alternatively, between 150-300mg of aspirin can be taken.
Travelers
There is clinical evidence to suggest that wearing compression socks while travelling also reduces the incidence of thrombosis in people on long haul flights. A randomised study in 2001 compared two sets of long haul airline passengers, one set wore travel compression hosiery the others did not. The passengers were all scanned and blood tested to check for the incidence of DVT. The results showed that asymptomatic DVT occurred in 10% of the passengers who did not wear compression socks. The group wearing compression had no DVTs. The authors concluded that wearing elastic compression hosiery reduces the incidence of DVT in long haul airline passengers.[19].
Pathogenesis
Many factors are involved in the formation of a thrombus (clot). Virchow's triad is a group of 3 factors known to affect clot formation: rate of flow, the consistency (thickness) of the blood, and qualities of the vessel wall. Among the risk factors are advanced age, obesity, infection, immobilization, female sex, use of oral contraceptives, tobacco usage and air travel ("economy class syndrome", a combination of immobility and relative dehydration) are some of the better-known causes.[20] Thrombophilia (tendency to develop thrombosis) often expresses itself with recurrent thromboses.
It is recognised that thrombi usually develop first in the calf veins, "growing" in the direction of flow of the vein. DVTs are distinguished as being above or below the popliteal vein. Very extensive DVTs can extend into the iliac veins or the inferior vena cava. The risk of pulmonary embolism is higher in the presence of more extensive clots.
Epidemiology
DVTs occur in about 1 per 1000 persons per year. About 1-5% will die from the complications (i.e. pulmonary embolism).
DVT is much less common in the pediatric population. About 1 in 100,000 people under the age of 18 experiences deep vein thrombosis, possibly due to a child's high rate of heartbeats per minute, relatively active lifestyle when compared with adults, and fewer comorbodities (e.g. malignancy).
See also
References
- ↑ Scarvelis D, Wells P (2006). "Diagnosis and treatment of deep-vein thrombosis.". CMAJ 175 (9): 1087-92. PMID 17060659. Free Full Text.
- ↑ Neff MJ. ACEP releases clinical policy on evaluation and management of pulmonary embolism. American Family Physician. 2003; 68(4):759-?. Available at: http://www.aafp.org/afp/20030815/practice.html. Accessed on: December 8, 2006.
- ↑ Wells P, Anderson D, Rodger M, Ginsberg J, Kearon C, Gent M, Turpie A, Bormanis J, Weitz J, Chamberlain M, Bowie D, Barnes D, Hirsh J (2000). "Derivation of a simple clinical model to categorize patients probability of pulmonary embolism: increasing the models utility with the SimpliRED D-dimer.". Thromb Haemost 83 (3): 416-20. PMID 10744147.
- ↑ Watson L, Armon M. "Thrombolysis for acute deep vein thrombosis". Cochrane Database Syst Rev: CD002783. PMID 15495034.
- ↑ 5.0 5.1 Snow V et al (2007). "Management of Venous Thromboembolism: A Clinical Practice Guideline from the American College of Physicians and the American Academy of Family Physicians". Ann Intern Med 146 (3).
Cite error: Invalid
<ref>
tag; name "pmid0000" defined multiple times with different content - ↑ Hutten BA, Prins MH (2006). "Duration of treatment with vitamin K antagonists in symptomatic venous thromboembolism". Cochrane database of systematic reviews (Online) (1): CD001367. DOI:10.1002/14651858.CD001367.pub2. PMID 16437432. Research Blogging.
- ↑ Kolbach D, Sandbrink M, Hamulyak K, Neumann H, Prins M. "Non-pharmaceutical measures for prevention of post-thrombotic syndrome". Cochrane Database Syst Rev: CD004174. DOI:10.1002/14651858.CD004174.pub2. PMID 14974060. Research Blogging.
- ↑ Kakkos S, Daskalopoulou S, Daskalopoulos M, Nicolaides A, Geroulakos G (2006). "Review on the value of graduated elastic compression stockings after deep vein thrombosis". Thromb Haemost 96 (4): 441-5. PMID 17003920.
- ↑ Decousus H, Leizorovicz A, Parent F, Page Y, Tardy B, Girard P, Laporte S, Faivre R, Charbonnier B, Barral F, Huet Y, Simonneau G (1998). "A clinical trial of vena caval filters in the prevention of pulmonary embolism in patients with proximal deep-vein thrombosis. Prévention du Risque d'Embolie Pulmonaire par Interruption Cave Study Group". N Engl J Med 338 (7): 409-15. PMID 9459643.
- ↑ (2005) "Eight-year follow-up of patients with permanent vena cava filters in the prevention of pulmonary embolism: the PREPIC (Prevention du Risque d'Embolie Pulmonaire par Interruption Cave) randomized study". Circulation 112 (3): 416-22. PMID 16009794.
- ↑ Trujillo-Santos J, Herrera S, Page MA, et al (2006). "Predicting adverse outcome in outpatients with acute deep vein thrombosis. findings from the RIETE Registry". J. Vasc. Surg. 44 (4): 789-93. DOI:10.1016/j.jvs.2006.06.032. PMID 16926081. Research Blogging.
- ↑ 12.0 12.1 Geerts WH, Pineo GF, Heit JA, Bergqvist D, Lassen MR, Colwell CW, Ray JG. Prevention of venous thromboembolism: the Seventh ACCP Conference on Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy.
Chest. 2004 Sep;126 (3 Suppl):338S-400S. http://www.chestjournal.org/cgi/content/full/126/3_suppl/338S PMID 15383478 Cite error: Invalid
<ref>
tag; name "pmid15383478" defined multiple times with different content - ↑ King CS, Holley AB, Jackson JL, Shorr AF, Moores LK (2007). "Twice vs three times daily heparin dosing for thromboembolism prophylaxis in the general medical population: A metaanalysis". Chest 131 (2): 507–16. PMID 17296655.
- ↑ Wein L et al. Pharmacological Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis in Hospitalized Medical Patients. Arch Intern med 2007;167:1476-1486.
- ↑ 15.0 15.1 Lederle FA, Sacks JM, Fiore L, Landefeld CS, Steinberg N, Peters RW, Eid AA, Sebastian J, Stasek JE Jr, Fye CL. The prophylaxis of medical patients for thromboembolism pilot study. Am J Med. 2006;119:54-9. PMID 16431185
- ↑ Dentali F, Douketis JD, Gianni M, Lim W, Crowther MA. Meta-analysis: anticoagulant prophylaxis to prevent symptomatic venous thromboembolism in hospitalized medical patients. Ann Intern Med. 2007;146:278-88. PMID 17310052
- ↑ Gärdlund B (1996). "Randomised, controlled trial of low-dose heparin for prevention of fatal pulmonary embolism in patients with infectious diseases. The Heparin Prophylaxis Study Group". Lancet 347 (9012): 1357–61. PMID 8637340. [e]
- ↑ Lyman GH, Khorana AA, Falanga A, et al (2007). "American Society of Clinical Oncology Guideline: Recommendations for Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis and Treatment in Patients With Cancer". DOI:10.1200/JCO.2007.14.1283. PMID 17968019. Research Blogging.
- ↑ Scurr JH, Machin SJ, Bailey-King S, Mackie IJ, McDonald S, Smith PD. Frequency and prevention of symptomless deep-vein thrombosis in long-haul flights: a randomised trial. Lancet 2001;12(9267):1485-9. PMID 11377600.
- ↑ Tsai A, Cushman M, Rosamond W, Heckbert S, Polak J, Folsom A (2002). "Cardiovascular risk factors and venous thromboembolism incidence: the longitudinal investigation of thromboembolism etiology.". Arch Intern Med 162 (10): 1182-9. PMID 12020191.
External links
- Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT) Prevention, Treatment, Diagnosis, & Related Issues - ClotCare.com
- Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT) Blood Clot Prevention, Treatment, and More - DVT.net
- Paget-von Schrötter disease - whonamedit.com
- DVT - emedicine.com
- AntiCoagulation Europe - AntiCoagulation Europe is a charity providing information and advice to people on oral anticoagulation therapy
- Prevent DVT Coalition
- J Scurr Lancet study summary
- mediUK DVT prevention during travel, the clinical evidence
- Victims of Air Related DVT Association