Talk:Color: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Greg Woodhouse
(Categories - synchronicity)
imported>Robert W King
(This segment:)
Line 50: Line 50:
*http://www.multimediaarts.com/watercolors/colrhist.htm
*http://www.multimediaarts.com/watercolors/colrhist.htm
*http://www.newton.dep.anl.gov/askasci/gen01/gen01703.htm
*http://www.newton.dep.anl.gov/askasci/gen01/gen01703.htm
== This segment: ==
"The [[wavelngth]] of monochromotic light (or of an individual photon) falls into a continuous range of about 400 to 750 nanometers. We split this range up into seven colors because they correspond well to the way we ''see'' light."
I agree it's an integral part of the article but where it currently stands is a little out of place; it does not "flow".  Perhaps it should go into the introductory paragraph?--[[User:Robert W King|Robert W King]] 11:52, 15 July 2007 (CDT)

Revision as of 10:52, 15 July 2007


Article Checklist for "Color"
Workgroup category or categories Biology Workgroup, Physics Workgroup, Visual Arts Workgroup [Editors asked to check categories]
Article status Stub: no more than a few sentences
Underlinked article? No
Basic cleanup done? No
Checklist last edited by Russell Potter 08:32, 13 June 2007 (CDT)

To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.





Work in progress.--Robert W King 08:28, 13 June 2007 (CDT)

Categories

Not sure where this should go -- will this be an entry on color as part of the visible spectrum of light, on the biology of color reception by the human eye or brain, or color in the arts? Russell Potter 08:33, 13 June 2007 (CDT)

I think all three! I plan to discuss pigments, how it's produced in various materials, use; but also elaborate more on the scientific process behind it. There's lots of work to do.--Robert W King 08:32, 13 June 2007 (CDT)

The funny thing is, I was just about to add biology, but someone beat me to it. Greg Woodhouse 14:56, 13 July 2007 (CDT)


Reference links

This segment:

"The wavelngth of monochromotic light (or of an individual photon) falls into a continuous range of about 400 to 750 nanometers. We split this range up into seven colors because they correspond well to the way we see light."

I agree it's an integral part of the article but where it currently stands is a little out of place; it does not "flow". Perhaps it should go into the introductory paragraph?--Robert W King 11:52, 15 July 2007 (CDT)