Talk:Christianity: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Mark Jones
imported>Richard Pettitt
(question about number of followers)
Line 9: Line 9:


:Hello Jonathon. No problem with bias there at all—I think the sections are very well written and from a neutral point-of-view. It's good to have you on the wiki. [[User:Mark Jones|Mark Jones]] 10:17, 18 January 2008 (CST)
:Hello Jonathon. No problem with bias there at all—I think the sections are very well written and from a neutral point-of-view. It's good to have you on the wiki. [[User:Mark Jones|Mark Jones]] 10:17, 18 January 2008 (CST)
==2 Billion adherents==
Really? That just seems... too high. Is there anyone knowledgeable on the subject that could confirm or deny this? [[User:Richard Pettitt|Richard Pettitt]]

Revision as of 14:09, 18 January 2008

This article is developing and not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition The largest world religion, which centers around the worship of one God, his son Jesus Christ, and his Holy Spirit. [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup categories Religion and History [Editors asked to check categories]
 Talk Archive none  English language variant British English

Background

Is it the largest religion or the most practiced? Is this a regional statistic or a world statistic? --Robert W King 14:52, 7 May 2007 (CDT)

Theology

Added multiple sections. Quite possibly biased because I'm a Christian; let me know if anything needs to be changed. Jonathan Beshears 04:20, 18 January 2008 (CST)

Hello Jonathon. No problem with bias there at all—I think the sections are very well written and from a neutral point-of-view. It's good to have you on the wiki. Mark Jones 10:17, 18 January 2008 (CST)

2 Billion adherents

Really? That just seems... too high. Is there anyone knowledgeable on the subject that could confirm or deny this? Richard Pettitt