Hacker: Difference between revisions
imported>Eric M Gearhart (removed the table of contents for now, as it just gets in the way) |
imported>Eric M Gearhart m (moved NOTOC to the bottom of the article) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Generally in society today asking someone if they are a '''hacker''' can either be construed as a compliment or it is a loaded question. | Generally in society today asking someone if they are a '''hacker''' can either be construed as a compliment or it is a loaded question. | ||
Line 25: | Line 23: | ||
[[Category:Computers Workgroup]] | [[Category:Computers Workgroup]] | ||
[[Category:Law]] | [[Category:Law]] | ||
__NOTOC__ |
Revision as of 10:30, 10 April 2007
Generally in society today asking someone if they are a hacker can either be construed as a compliment or it is a loaded question.
Two sides of the Coin
Hackers as criminals
The media have generally painted hackers as computer security criminals. Some proponents of the original meaning of "hacker" call these people crackers, to point out specifically they "crack security."
Hackers as Knowledge Seekers
The original meaning of the term hacker was someone who had great technical knowledge. A hack was something to be proud of, usually described as pushing something beyond its design limits. People who usually "hacked on" certain projects would have descriptive names bestowed upon them, thus someone who wrote a lot of kernel code would come to be called a "kernel hacker," or someone who worked on and was knowledgeable with the Unix operating system would come to be called a "Unix hacker."
The Jargon file describes a hacker as "One who enjoys the intellectual challenge of creatively overcoming or circumventing limitations."[1]
References
External links
How To Become A Hacker by Eric S. Raymond. Describes how to become a hacker in the "traditional sense" - someone with "technical adeptness and a delight in solving problems and overcoming limits"