Talk:Archive:Maintainability: Difference between revisions
imported>Andries Krugers Dagneaux (I think that merging small article that treat more or less the same subject increases maintainability.) |
imported>Andries Krugers Dagneaux (I think that merging several small articles that treat more or less the same subject increases maintainability.) |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
[[User:Robert Winmill|Robert Winmill]] 08:19, 11 May 2007 (CDT) | [[User:Robert Winmill|Robert Winmill]] 08:19, 11 May 2007 (CDT) | ||
I think that merging small | I think that merging several small articles that treat more or less the same subject increases maintainability. [[User:Andries Krugers Dagneaux|Andries]] 06:14, 28 May 2007 (CDT) | ||
Revision as of 05:15, 28 May 2007
Put simply, does this mean that the scope of Citizendium covers fewer articles than wikipedia? If so, out of the 1m or so articles on wikipedia, could you give a feel for how many should be covered on Citizendium? 1 in 10? 1 in 100? Andrew Turvey 17:39, 8 April 2007 (CDT)
Some articles in any encyclopedia are static in nature, they are usually on a smaller topic or less notable topic. Since all edits to an article are documented, and dated, a reader can see when the information was current. Even if the article has not been "maintained" it could still be of interest to a reader. If these articles are deleted then they should go into some sort of tombs or into another segment of CZ for example en.citizendium.org/Local:subject name - date of last edit . Someday CZ may have enough authors to document every local school, every county, who knows. I know that when it starts to have that depth, with editing controls, then CZ will be the reference source.
Robert Winmill 08:19, 11 May 2007 (CDT)
I think that merging several small articles that treat more or less the same subject increases maintainability. Andries 06:14, 28 May 2007 (CDT)