Talk:Sun Tzu: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Chris Day
(test new version of {{acronym}} template)
imported>Petréa Mitchell
(Article checklist)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{checklist
|                abc = Sun Tzu
|                cat1 = Military
|                cat2 = Philosophy
|                cat3 =
|          cat_check = y
|              status = 4
|        underlinked = y
|            cleanup = y
|                  by = [[User:Petréa Mitchell|Petréa Mitchell]] 11:28, 28 April 2007 (CDT)
}}
I removed the sentence referring to a joke about George W. Bush as it (1) has only a tacit connection to the subject of the paragraph, (2) references a piece of casual pop-culture in a biography entry on a historical figure, (3) mentions an ongoing event, (4) is not a apparent that it is a "common joke," and (5) it might be interpreted (or misinterpreted) as a non-neutral {{acronym|POV}}.
I removed the sentence referring to a joke about George W. Bush as it (1) has only a tacit connection to the subject of the paragraph, (2) references a piece of casual pop-culture in a biography entry on a historical figure, (3) mentions an ongoing event, (4) is not a apparent that it is a "common joke," and (5) it might be interpreted (or misinterpreted) as a non-neutral {{acronym|POV}}.
--[[User:David Marcoe|David Marcoe]] 17:51, 7 April 2007 (CDT)
--[[User:David Marcoe|David Marcoe]] 17:51, 7 April 2007 (CDT)

Revision as of 10:28, 28 April 2007


Article Checklist for "Sun Tzu"
Workgroup category or categories Military Workgroup, Philosophy Workgroup [Editors asked to check categories]
Article status External article: from another source, with little change
Underlinked article? Yes
Basic cleanup done? Yes
Checklist last edited by Petréa Mitchell 11:28, 28 April 2007 (CDT)

To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.





I removed the sentence referring to a joke about George W. Bush as it (1) has only a tacit connection to the subject of the paragraph, (2) references a piece of casual pop-culture in a biography entry on a historical figure, (3) mentions an ongoing event, (4) is not a apparent that it is a "common joke," and (5) it might be interpreted (or misinterpreted) as a non-neutral — (The Constabulary has removed an initialism here. Please use plain English instead, for example, "biased" ) —. --David Marcoe 17:51, 7 April 2007 (CDT)